Cases 1 - 10 of 65
Combs v. United States Government
as 24-3616
Petitioner:
PATRICK DAVY COMBS
Respondent:
UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT
Slack v. Jinkens, et al.
as 24-2592
Plaintiff:
TOMMIE SLACK
Defendant:
W. JINKENS, Chaplain at Benton County Correction, JENNIFER LNU, Chaplain at Benton County Correction, COMBS, Lieutenant at Benton County Correction and others
Pshatoia LaRose v. Sean Combs et al
as 2:2024cv02340
Plaintiff:
Pshatoia LaRose
Defendant:
Sean Combs, Combs Enterprises, Combs Global and others
Combs v. United States District Court for the Southern District of California, San Diego
as 24-937
Petitioner:
PATRICK DAVY COMBS
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO
Interested Party:
UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT
Harris v. Combs, et al.
as 24-588
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER WILLIAM HARRIS
Defendant / Appellee:
LISA COMBS, US Probation, PROSECUTING ATTORNEY'S OFFICE, Prosecuting Attorney Overseeing Case No. CR-23-019-RAJ and JULIE JANSEN, Location Monitor Specialist
Harris v. American Behavioral Health System, et al.
as 24-347
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER WILLIAM HARRIS
Defendant / Appellee:
AMERICAN BEHAVIORAL HEALTH SYSTEM, Inpatient Facility, DONYES, Ms., Drug Counselor - SUDP ABHS, PROSECUTING ATTORNEY'S OFFICE and others
Elsa Merida v. Combe Incorporated
as 5:2023cv01359
Plaintiff:
Elsa Merida
Defendant:
Combe Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal
Mahan Taleshpour, et al v. Apple, Inc.
as 21-16282
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MAHAN TALESHPOUR, RORY FIELDING, PETER ODOGWU and others
Defendant / Appellee:
APPLE, INC.
Julius Bradford v. Steve Sisolak, et al
as 21-15379
Defendant / Appellee:
EDGAR EATHER, CLARK COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS, STEVE SISOLAK and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JULIUS BRADFORD
Michael Seals v. K. Allison, et al
as 20-17432
Defendant / Appellee:
R. DIAZ, D. DAVEY, D. GOREE and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL IZELL SEALS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
