Cases 1 - 10 of 213
Courtney Mitchener v. Talkspace Network LLC et al
as 2:2024cv07067
Plaintiff:
Courtney Mitchener
Defendant:
Talkspace Network LLC and Does 1 through 25, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Courtney Mitchener v. Fanduel, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv06410
Defendant:
Does 1 through 25, inclusive and Fanduel, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Courtney Mitchener
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Sweidy v. Spring Ridge Academy, et al.
as 24-4318
Defendant:
JUSTIN ZYCH, KATE DEILY, BRANDON COURTNEY and others
Plaintiff:
KIMBERLY R. SWEIDY, ATTORNEY
Ronen Helmann v. Codepink Women for Peace et al
as 2:2024cv05704
Defendant:
Palestinian Youth Movement, John and Jane Does, Codepink Women for Peace and others
Plaintiff:
Ronen Helmann, Cameron Higby and Judit Maull
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Mitchener v. ADT LLC
as 5:2024cv03669
Plaintiff:
Courtney Mitchener
Defendant:
ADT LLC Florida limited liability company doing business as ADT Security Services
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Andrich v. Glynn, et al.
as 24-3078
Plaintiff:
DEVIN ANDRICH
Defendant:
COURTNEY R. GLYNN, in her individual, official and supervisory capacities, BRAD K. KEOUGH, in his individual, supervisory and official capacities, DAVID SHINN, in his official capacity and others
Mitchener v. A.D.T. Corporation et al
as 5:2024cv02721
Plaintiff:
Courtney Mitchener
Defendant:
A.D.T. Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01029
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Reed v. Eugene School District 4J, et al.
as 24-789
Plaintiff:
GABRIEL REED, as Next of Friend to M.R.
Defendant:
EUGENE SCHOOL DISTRICT 4J, PAULA MCCOWN, JONATHAN ANDREW DEY, JR. and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
