Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Craig Hain v. Conopco, Inc.
as 2:2017cv03656
Defendant:
Conopco, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Craig Hain
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Pars Ice Cream Company, Inc. et al v. Conopco, Inc.
as 2:2017cv05248
Plaintiff:
Pars Ice Cream California, Inc. and Pars Ice Cream Company, Inc.
Defendant:
Conopco, Inc.
Material Witne:
Bijan Sadeghi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Pars Ice Cream Company, Inc. et al v. Conopco, Inc.
as 2:2017mc00067
Defendant:
Conopco, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Pars Ice Cream California, Inc. and Pars Ice Cream Company, Inc.
Thurston et al v. Conopco, Inc.
as 3:2010cv04937
Plaintiff:
Chanee Thurston and Tanasha Denmon-Clark
Defendant:
Conopco, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Thurston et al v. Conopco, Inc.
as 4:2010cv04937
Plaintiff:
Chanee Thurston and Tanasha Denmon-Clark
Defendant:
Conopco, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Tanasha Denmon-Clark v. Conopco, Inc.
as 2:2010cv07898
Defendant:
Conopco, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Tanasha Denmon-Clark
California Department of Toxic Substances Control State of et al v. Archer Daniels Midland Company et al
as 2:2007cv07966
Plaintiff:
California Department of Toxic Substances Control State of, California Department of Toxic Substances Control State of, The California Toxic Substances Control Account and others
Defendant:
Archer Daniels Midland Company, Atlantic Oil Company, Atlantic Richfield Company and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4332 Environmental Policy - Coop of Agency Reports
Azizian et al v. Federated Department Stores, Inc. et al
as 4:2003cv03359
Plaintiff:
Fatemah Azizian , Soraya Farrah , Eunice Fey and others
Defendant:
Federated Department Stores, Inc. , Boucheron (USA) Ltd. , Chanel, Inc. and others
Objector:
Susan Casenza , Valerie Theng Matherne , Kamela Wilkinson and others
Intervenor:
Susan Casenza and Valerie Theng Matherne
Pecial_master:
Charles B. Renfrew (Ret.)
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
