Other Statutes Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Hamilton v. Son
as 23-3805
Plaintiff / Appellant: DAVID HAMILTON
Defendant / Appellee: M. SON, Doctor
Hamilton v. Covello
as 22-1672
Petitioner: DAVID HAMILTON
Respondent: PATRICK COVELLO, WARDEN
David Hamilton v. People of the State of Califor, et al
as 21-55544
Petitioner / Appellant: DAVID HAMILTON
Respondent / Appellee: COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES and PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
David Hamilton v. Sam Wong, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 20-17287
Defendant / Appellee: SAM WONG, Dr.; CDCR Health Care Provider, CHRISTOPHER SMITH, M.D. Supervisor; CDCR Health Care Provider, MCKESSON PHARMACEUTICALS CORP. and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: DAVID HAMILTON
David Hamilton v. People of the State of California et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2017cv08154
Petitioner: David Hamilton
Respondent: Warden Lizzarraga and People of the State of California
David Hamilton v. Joe Lizarraga
as 17-72498
Petitioner: DAVID HAMILTON
Respondent: JOE A. LIZARRAGA, Warden, Warden
Michael Barber, et al v. Cordis Corporation
as 16-80140
Plaintiff - Respondent: MICHAEL BARBER, ANDREW CLOS, JACQUELYN HANSON and others
Defendant - Petitioner: CORDIS CORPORATION
Hatamian et al v. Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2014cv00226
Plaintiff: Babak Hatamian and Lussu Dennj Salvatore
Defendant: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc., Rory P. Read, Thomas J. Seifert and others
Petitioner: KBC Asset Management NV, Oklahoma Firefighters Pension and Retirement System, Arkansas Teacher Retirement System and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Cintas Corporation v. Bowles et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2006cv05123
Petitioner: Cintas Corporation
Respondent: Robert F. Bowles, Jr , Christopher Brown , Robert Burcke and others
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?