Other Statutes Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Maricela Ramirez v. Joshua Kornegay, et al
as 21-35645
Plaintiff / Appellant: MARICELA RAMIREZ
Defendant / Appellee: JOSHUA KORNEGAY, M.D., SARAH GOMEZ, M.D., ADDRIENNE HUGHES, M.D. and others
Lori Dew, et al v. City of Seaside, et al
as 21-15882
Plaintiff / Appellant: G. V., a minor, by and through his guardian ad litem, Maryanne Gould, L. V., W. V. and others
Defendant: CITY OF SEASIDE and ABDUL PRIDGFEN
Defendant / Appellee: OFFICER MANUEL FERNANDEZ
United States of America v. Dew
as 2:2016mc00081
Petitioner: United States of America
Respondent: Ronald Dew
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. ยง 7402
Clarence Dews v. Dave Davey
as 14-72611
Petitioner: CLARENCE LEON DEWS
Respondent: DAVE DAVEY, Warden
Clarence Dews v. Martin Biter
as 14-71182
Petitioner: CLARENCE LEON DEWS
Respondent: MARTIN BITER, Acting Warden
Clarence Dews v. Martin Biter
as 14-70751
Petitioner: CLARENCE LEON DEWS
Respondent: MARTIN BITER, Acting Warden
Clarence Dews v. Martin Biter
as 14-70559
Petitioner: CLARENCE LEON DEWS
Respondent: MARTIN BITER, Acting Warden
Clarence Dews v. USDC-CAFR
as 13-72664
: In re: CLARENCE LEON DEWS
Petitioner: CLARENCE LEON DEWS
Respondent: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, FRESNO
Real Party In Interest: MAURICE JUNIOUS, Warden, MARTIN D. BITER, Warden and EDMUND G. BROWN, Governor
Clarence Dews v. USDC-CAFR
as 12-73805
: In re: CLARENCE LEON DEWS
Petitioner: CLARENCE LEON DEWS
Respondent: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, FRESNO
Real Party In Interest: COUNTY OF KERN and CITY OF WASCO
Clarence Dews v. USDC-CAFR
as 12-73213
: In re: CLARENCE LEON DEWS
Petitioner: CLARENCE LEON DEWS
Respondent: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, FRESNO
Real Party In Interest: MARTIN BITER, Acting Warden

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?