Cases 1 - 10 of 1,614
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv05496
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Davis v. General Atomics, et al.
as 24-4740
Defendant:
DANZIG, ROSENBERG SHPALL & ZEIGEN, APLC, SAN DIEGO BIZ LAW, APC and others
Plaintiff:
TERENCE D. DAVIS
Davis v. United States District Court for the Eastern District of California, Sacramento
as 24-4694
Real Party In Interest:
SAMUEL MCALPINE, JAMES WALKER, CHERYL BAKEWELL and others
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SACRAMENTO
Petitioner:
KENNARD LEE DAVIS
Davis v. United States District Court for the Eastern District of California, Sacramento
as 24-4693
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SACRAMENTO
Real Party In Interest:
S FLORY, EDMONSON, JAMES WALKER and others
Petitioner:
KENNARD LEE DAVIS
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv01630
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Moralez v. Davis, et al.
as 24-4552
Plaintiff:
RUDOLPH MORALEZ
Defendant:
RALPH DIAZ, Secretary CDCR, RON BROOMFIELD, Warden (A) SQ, RON DAVIS, Warden and others
Herrera, et al. v. City of Palmdale, et al.
as 24-4489
Defendant:
Palmdale Officer BLAKELY, individual and official capacity, JAMES PURTEE, individual and official capacity, NARDY LOPEZ, individual and official capacity and others
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM RYAN HERRERA, WILLIAM ROBERT HERRERA, Individually and on behalf of their minor child N. P. H., MONA MOLINA HERRERA, Individually and on behalf of their minor child N. P. H. and others
(PS) Davis v. Shepard et al
as 2:2024cv01952
Defendant:
El Dorado County, Jaya Badiga, Sacramento Department of Child Support Services and others
Plaintiff:
Eric Davon Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
