Other Statutes Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 1,253
Corbray v. Bennett
as 24-3822
Petitioner: DENNIS DERISE CORBRAY
Respondent: JASON BENNETT
Rivera-Trigueros v. Garland
as 24-3764
Petitioner: DENNIS ORLANDO RIVERA-TRIGUEROS
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
In re: Dennis John McGlothin
as 2:2024rd00059
Hammett v. Stern, et al.
as 24-3621
Plaintiff: LAURA LYNN HAMMETT
Defendant: ELLIS ROY STERN, Esq., an individual, ALAN N. GOLDBERG, Esq., an individual, MARY E. SHERMAN and others
Goode v. Canedo, et al.
as 24-3448
Plaintiff: BENJAMIN DENNIS GOODE
Defendant: J. CANEDO, Then, Correctional Sergeant; Now, Correctional Lieutenant, JOHN AND JANE DOES, 1-100, Correctional Staff and J. CANEJO
Friedt v. Salmonsen
as 24-3389
Petitioner: DENNIS MARTIN FRIEDT
Respondent: JIM SALMONSEN
Perkins v. Panorama Towers Condominium Unit Owners Association, Inc., et al.
as 24-3329
Plaintiff: PRESTON D. PERKINS, JR.
Defendant: PANORAMA TOWERS CONDOMINIUM UNIT OWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC., DENNIS KARIGER, LUCKY LACT, LLC and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv01003
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Corbray v. Bennett
as 24-2504
Petitioner: DENNIS D CORBRAY and Dennis Derise Corbray
Respondent: JASON BENNETT, Superintendent, Stafford Creek Corrections Center
In the matter of the Complaint of DENNIS K. GARRISON, as the owner of the 1989 Sea Ray 340 Sundancer Little Buddy
as 4:2024cv02282
Not Yet Classified: In the matter of the Complaint of DENNIS K. GARRISON, as the owner of the 1989 Sea Ray 340 Sundancer Little Buddy, for Exoneration from, or Limitation of, Liability, Dennis K. Garrison and In the matter of the Complaint of DENNIS K. GARRISON, as the owner of the 1989 Sea Ray 340 Sundancer Little Buddy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?