Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Anderson v. Ravalli County Sheriff, et al.
as 24-2100
Plaintiff:
MARK E. ANDERSON
Defendant:
RAVALLI COUNTY SHERIFF, TODD BOHLING, POLLY ANDERSON and others
Joseph Littlefield v. E. Anderson
as 21-35876
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOSEPH TYLER LITTLEFIELD
Defendant / Appellee:
E. ANDERSON, Sergeant, Clallam County Sheriff's Office
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv07164
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Jonathan Rodriguez v. Brigette Amsberry, et al
as 20-36027
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JONATHAN JASON RODRIGUEZ
Defendant / Appellee:
S. BROWN, D. PEDRO, E. ANDERSON and others
Jonathan Rodriguez v. Brigitte Amsberry, et al
as 20-36028
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JONATHAN JASON RODRIGUEZ
Defendant / Appellee:
FRANK SERRANO, S. BROWN, POPE and others
SEC v. Anthony Vassallo, et al
as 14-16647
Plaintiff - Appellee:
U.S. SECURITIES & EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Defendant - Appellee:
ANTHONY VASSALLO, KENNETH KENITZER and EQUITY INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT AND TRADING, INC.
Real-party-in-interest - Appellant:
MICHAEL J. CALLAHAN
Receiver - Appellee:
STEPHEN E. ANDERSON, Receiver for Equity Investor Management and Training, Inc.
Ross Shade v. Richard Anderson, et al
as 13-16685
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROSS S. SHADE
Defendant - Appellee:
RICHARD E. ANDERSON, ROBERT D. FRANCIS and OFFICERS AND DIRECTORS OF THE DOCTORS COMPANY INSURANCE SERVICES, LLC
Shade v. Anderson et al
as 3:2013cv02303
Plaintiff:
Ross Shade
Defendant:
Richard E. Anderson , Robert D. Francis and Officers & Directors of the Doctors Company Insurance Services LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Capitol Commission, Inc. v. Capitol Ministries
as 3:2012mc80149
Plaintiff:
Capitol Commission, Inc.
Defendant:
Capitol Ministries
3rd_party_plaintiff:
Capitol Ministries
3rd_party_defendant:
John E. Anderson, Jr., George H. Jackson, James E. Young and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
