Cases 1 - 10 of 30
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00222
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
In Re: Lenovo Adware Litigation
as 4:2015md02624
Plaintiff:
Jayne Constanzo, Susan Webster-Shultz, Michelle Behren and others
Defendant:
Lenovo Inc., Lenovo Group Limited and Superfish, Inc.
In Re:
In Re: Lenovo Adware Litigation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Sandy Torrez v. Infinity Insurance Company et al
as 2:2022cv05171
Plaintiff:
Sandy Torrez
Defendant:
Infinity Insurance Company and Kemper Corporation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv04441
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Vivian Schwartz, et al v. Kemper Independence Insurance
as 21-56356
Plaintiff / Appellant:
VIVIAN SCHWARTZ, an individual and LAWRENCE SCHWARTZ, an individual
Defendant / Appellee:
KEMPER INDEPENDENCE INSURANCE COMPANY, a Delaware corporation
George Austin v. Kemper Corporation (Insurance)
as 21-16939
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GEORGE JARVIS AUSTIN
Defendant / Appellee:
KEMPER CORPORATION (INSURANCE)
Tyrone Lee v. Balmesada, et al
as 21-35709
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TYRONE JERALD LEE
Defendant / Appellee:
BALMESADA, Lt., B. KEMPER, Sgt. and RONNIE L. FOSS, Hearing Officer
Patricia Holloway v. Clackamas River Water, et al
as 20-35888
Defendant / Appellee:
BARBARA KEMPER, NAOMI ANGIER, CLACKAMAS RIVER WATER and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PATRICIA HOLLOWAY
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2020cv02104
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Patricia Holloway v. USDC-ORP
as 20-73310
Not Classified By Court:
VANCE VOYLES, DOUG ANDERSON, MICHAEL CARDWELL and others
Petitioner:
PATRICIA HOLLOWAY
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON, PORTLAND
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
