Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Doe, et al. v. Deutsche Lufthansa Aktiengesellschaft, et al.
as 24-2829
Plaintiff:
JOHN DOE and ROBERT ROE
Defendant:
DEUTSCHE LUFTHANSA AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT and LUFTHANSA GROUP BUSINESS SERVICES NEW YORK LLC
In Re: In the Matter of the Application of Lufthansa Technik AG, Petitioner, for an Order Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1782
as 8:2022mc00034
In Re:
In the Matter of the Application of Lufthansa Technik AG, Petitioner, for an Order Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1782
Petitioner:
Lufthansa Technik AG
Respondent:
Thales Avionics, Inc.
Intervenor:
Astronics Advanced Electronic Systems Corp.
In Re: In the Matter of the Application of Lufthansa Technik AG, Petitioner, for an Order Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1782
as 8:2022cv02336
Petitioner:
Lufthansa Technik AG
Respondent:
Thales Avionics, Inc.
In Re:
In the Matter of the Application of Lufthansa Technik AG, Petitioner, for an Order Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1782
Karla Maree v. Deutsche Lufthansa A.G.
as 21-55154
Plaintiff / Appellee:
KARLA MAREE, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated
Defendant / Appellant:
DEUTSCHE LUFTHANSA A.G.
Lufthansa Technik AG v. Thales Avionics, Inc.
as 20-56293
Intervenor:
ASTRONICS ADVANCED ELECTRONIC SYSTEMS CORP.
Not Classified By Court:
In re: IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF LUFTHANSA TECHNIK AG, PETITIONER, FOR AN ORDER PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. 1782 TO TAKE DISCOVERY, PURSUANT TO THE FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, OF RESPONDENT
Respondent / Appellee:
THALES AVIONICS, INC.
Petitioner / Appellant:
LUFTHANSA TECHNIK AG
In Re In the Matter of the Application of Lufthansa Technik AG, Petitioner, for an Order Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1782 to Take Discovery, Pursuant to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, of Respondent
as 8:2019mc00016
Petitioner:
Lufthansa Technik AG
Respondent:
Thales Avionics, Inc.
Intervenor:
Astronics Advanced Electronic Systems Corp.
In Re:
In the Matter of the Application of Lufthansa Technik AG, Petitioner, for an Order Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1782
Lucia Kruschewsky v. Deutsche Lufthansa AG et al
as 2:2017cv03774
Defendant:
Deutsche Lufthansa AG and Does
Plaintiff:
Lucia Kruschewsky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Rusto Madzar v. Austrian Airlines AG et al
as 2:2017cv08800
Defendant:
Austrian Airlines AG, Deutsche Lufthansa Aktiengesellschaft and Does
Plaintiff:
Rusto Madzar
Lufthansa Technik v. Panasonic Avionics Corporation
as 2:2017cv01453
Petitioner:
Lufthansa Technik
Respondent:
Panasonic Avionics Corporation
Intervenor:
Astronics Advanced Electronic Systems Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1782
Harry Hormoz Mitchell-Sheikh v. Lufthansa German Airlines et al
as 2:2013cv08242
Defendant:
Deutsche Lufthansa AG, Does, Lufthansa German Airlines and others
Plaintiff:
Harry Hormoz Mitchell-Sheikh
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
