Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Paul Johnson v. J. Beard, et al
as 21-16846
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PAUL DAVID JOHNSON
Defendant / Appellee:
J. A. BEARD, Director/Secretary of CDCR, D. L. RUNNELS, Warden, Warden of HDSP, J. PRICE, Warden, DVI and others
Paul Johnson v. J. Beard, et al
as 21-16368
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PAUL DAVID JOHNSON
Defendant / Appellee:
J. A. BEARD, Director/Secretary of CDCR, D. L. RUNNELS, Warden, Warden of HDSP, J. PRICE, Warden, DVI and others
Paul Johnson v. Joseph Chudy, et al
as 21-16110
Defendant / Appellee:
J. A. BEARD, Director of CDCR, A. TRAQUINA, M.D., CMO, NORMA ACQUVA, M.D., HCM and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PAUL DAVID JOHNSON
Paul Johnson v. D. Runnels, et al
as 21-15888
Defendant / Appellee:
Y. P. CHEN, MD at CSP-SOL, BINOYE NAKU, L. B. BROWN, Jr., MD at CDCR and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PAUL DAVID JOHNSON
Paul Johnson v. Mahmoud, et al
as 20-16498
Defendant:
J. PRICE, N. ACQUVA, F. KREITLER and others
Defendant / Appellee:
G. SWARTHOUT, Y. P. CHEN, MAHMOUD, MD at CSP-SOL and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PAUL DAVID JOHNSON
Paul Johnson v. Jeffrey Beard, et al
as 19-16485
Defendant / Appellee:
Y. P. CHEN, MD at CSP-SOL, W. ZHENG, MD for DVI, MAHMOUD, MD at CSP-SOL and others
Defendant:
A. TRAQUINA, MD at CSP-SOL
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PAUL DAVID JOHNSON
Kenneth James Maxwell Jr v. Grace M Kim et al
as 2:2017cv06349
Defendant:
Nelson Arcilla and Grace M Kim
Plaintiff:
Kenneth James Maxwell, Jr.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv01648
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692
Optional Capital, Inc. v. USDC, Los Angele
as 11-71786
:
In re: OPTIONAL CAPITAL, INC., a corporation, AKA Optional Ventures
Petitioner:
OPTIONAL CAPITAL, INC., AKA Optional Ventures
Respondent:
USDC, LOS ANGELES
Real Party In Interest:
DAS CORPORATION, FKA Daebu Machinery Co., Ltd., CHRISTOPHER KIM, AKA Chris Kim, AKA KJ Kim, AKA Kyung Joon Kim, ERICA M. KIM and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
