Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00925
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
David Brown et al v. Duane A. Hughes et al
as 2:2021cv04412
Defendant:
Duane A. Hughes, Workhorse Group Inc., Stephen Fleming and others
Plaintiff:
David Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Mark Kistenmacher v. Duane A. Hughes et al
as 2:2021cv04294
Defendant:
Duane A. Hughes, Pamela S. Mader, Workhorse Group Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Mark Kistenmacher
Arthur Ezor v. Katherine Mader, et al
as 19-55558
Defendant / Appellee:
KATHERINE K. MADER, DOES, 1 through 10, inclusive and DEBORAH S. BRAZIL
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ARTHUR EDWARD EZOR
Paul Sapan v. Meridian Law Group, P.L. et al
as 8:2015cv00208
Defendant:
Beth Ann Di Santo, Eric A. Mader, Meridian Law Group, P.L. and others
Plaintiff:
Paul Sapan
Estes v. Gaston et al
as 2:2012cv01853
Defendant:
Deborah Agosti, D. Bruce Anderson, Stewart L. Bell and others
Plaintiff:
Michael W. Estes
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Michael Douglas, et al v. Town of Portola Valley, et al
as 10-17804
Defendant / Appellee:
TOWN OF PORTOLA VALLEY, a public entity, LUIS MEJIA, an individual, CHRISTOPHER BUJA, an individual and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL DOUGLAS and LISA DOUGLAS, as individuals and as Trustees of the Douglas Family Trust
Marshall & Swift/Boeckh, LLC v. URS Corporation et al
as 2:2008cv04375
Defendant:
DOES, Dewberry & Davis LLC and URS Corporation
Counter Claimant:
Dewberry & Davis LLC and Dewberry & Davis LLC
Unknown:
Shannon Edward Mader, Shannon Edward Mader and Shannon Edward Mader
Counter Defendant:
Marshall & Swift/Boeckh, LLC and Marshall & Swift/Boeckh, LLC
Plaintiff:
Marshall & Swift/Boeckh, LLC
Real Party In Interest Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
