Other Statutes Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Daro v. Embark Technology, Inc. et al
as 4:2023cv03246
Plaintiff: Andy Daro
Defendant: Embark Technology, Inc., Elaine Chao, Patricia Chiodo and others
Tarlecky v. Embark Technology, Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv03211
Plaintiff: Karen Tarlecky
Defendant: Embark Technology, Inc., Elaine Chao, Patricia Chiodo and others
Battle Mountain Band of the Te-Moak Tribe of Western Shoshone Indians et al v. McKinsey & Company, Inc.
as 3:2022cv01282
Plaintiff: Battle Mountain Band of the Te-Moak Tribe of Western Shoshone Indians, Elko Band of the Te-Moak Tribe of Western Shoshone Indians, Ely Shoshone Tribe of Nevada and others
Defendant: McKinsey & Company, Inc. and John Does 1-100
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Platform 10, LLC v. Battle Mountain Band - Te-Moak We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 21-17018
Plaintiff / Appellant: PLATFORM 10, LLC
Defendant / Appellee: BATTLE MOUNTAIN BAND OF THE TE-MOAK TRIBE OF WESTERN SHOSHONE INDIANS OF NEVADA
Battle Mountain Band of the Te-Moak Tribe of Western Shoshone Indians v. United States Bureau of Land Management et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2016cv00268
Plaintiff: Battle Mountain Band of the Te-Moak Tribe of Western Shoshone Indians
Intervenor Defendant: Carlin Resources, LLC
Defendant: Jill C. Silvey and United States Bureau of Land Management
Movant: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Injunction
Te-Moak Tribe of Western Shosh, et al v. DOI, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 12-15412
Plaintiff - Appellant: TE-MOAK TRIBE OF WESTERN SHOSHONE INDIANS OF NEVADA, TIMBISHA SHOSHONE TRIBE, WESTERN SHOSHONE DEFENSE PROJECT and others
Defendant - Appellee: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, UNITED STATES BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT and GERALD M. SMITH, District Manager, Battle Mountain Field Office
Defendant-intervenor - Appellee: BARRICK CORTEZ, INC.
Te-Moak Tribe of Western Shoshone Indians et al v. United States Departement of the Interior et al
as 3:2011cv00762
Plaintiff: Paula Brady, Bryan Cassadore, Davis Gonzalez and others
Defendant: Larry Echo Hawk, William Knight, Sim Malotte and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
South Fork Band Council of We, et al v. DOI, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 09-15230
Plaintiff - Appellant: SOUTH FORK BAND COUNCIL OF WESTERN SHOSHONE OF NEVADA, TE-MOAK TRIBE OF WESTERN SHOSHONE INDIANS OF NEVADA, TIMBISHA SHOSHONE TRIBE and others
Defendant - Appellee: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, UNITED STATES BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT and GERALD M. SMITH, District Manager, Battle Mountain Field Office
Defendant-intervenor - Appellee: BARRICK CORTEZ, INC.
The Housing Authority of the Te-Moak Tribe of Western Shoshone Indians et al v. United States Department of Housing and Urban Development et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2008cv00626
Plaintiff: The Housing Authority of the Te-Moak Tribe of Western Shoshone Indians and The Housing Authority of the Te-Moak Tribe of Western Shoshone Indians
Defendant: United States Department of Housing and Urban Development, Steve Preston, Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, Paula Blunt, General Deputy Assistant Secretary for Public and Indian Housing and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Type: Other Statutes None
Te-Moak Tribe Wester, et al v. DOI, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 07-16336
Plaintiff - Appellant: TE-MOAK TRIBE OF WESTERN SHOSHONE OF NEVADA, WESTERN SHOSHONE DEFENSE PROJECT and GREAT BASIN MINE WATCH
Defendant - Appellee: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, ROBERT V. ABBEY, State Director, GAIL G. GIVENS, Assistant Field Manager, Battle Mountain Field Office and others
Defendant-intervenor - Appellee: CORTEZ GOLD MINES

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?