Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Moore v. Mars Petcare US, Inc. et al
as 3:2016cv07001
Defendant:
Mars Petcare US, Inc, Mars Petcare US, Inc., Nestle Purina Petcare Company and others
Plaintiff:
Moore, Tamara Moore, Greta L. Ervin and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Petsmart, Inc. v. Dancor Construction, Inc. et al
as 8:2020mc00068
Defendant:
Dancor Construction, Inc. and Daniel J. Policicchio, Sr.
Plaintiff:
Petsmart, Inc.
Tamara Moore, et al v. Mars Petcare US, Inc., et al
as 18-15026
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TAMARA MOORE, GRETA L. ERVIN, RAFF ARANDO and others
Defendant / Appellee:
MARS PETCARE US, INC., NESTLE PURINA PETCARE COMPANY, HILL'S PET NUTRITION, INC. and others
Amicus Curiae:
ALLIANCE FOR AUTOMOTIVE INNOVATION
Benita Ann McCord v. PetSmart, Inc.
as 8:2018cv01022
Defendant:
DOES and PetSmart, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Benita Ann McCord
Hana King v. PetSmart, Inc., et al
as 2:2018cv04517
Defendant:
Does and PetSmart, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Hana King
Tamara Moore, et al v. Mars Petcare US, Inc., et al
as 18-15026
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TAMARA MOORE, GRETA L. ERVIN, RAFF ARANDO and others
Defendant - Appellee:
MARS PETCARE US, INC., NESTLE PURINA PETCARE COMPANY, HILL'S PET NUTRITION, INC. and others
Drybar Holdings LLC v. PetSmart Inc. et al
as 8:2017cv02224
Defendant:
Does, Fetch . . . For Pets!, Fetch For Cool Pets LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Drybar Holdings LLC
Tina Maldonado v. PetSmart, Inc et al
as 5:2017cv01950
Defendant:
Does and PetSmart, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Tina Maldonado
Moore v. Mars Petcare US, Inc. et al
as 4:2016cv07001
Plaintiff:
Tamara Moore , Greta L. Ervin , Raff Arando and others
Defendant:
Mars Petcare US, Inc. , Nestle Purina Petcare Company , Hill's Pet Nutrition, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Lindsey Loomis v. PetSmart, Inc. et al
as 2:2015mc00053
Defendant:
Does and PetSmart, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Lindsey Loomis
USDC Northern District Of California, 5:12-cv-035770EJD:
Moore vs. PetSmart
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
