Other Statutes Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Lawyers For Fair Reciprocal Admission v. United States of America, et al.
as 24-2213
Plaintiff: LAWYERS FOR FAIR RECIPROCAL ADMISSION
Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL, MARY H. MURGUIA, CHIEF CIRCUIT JUDGE and others
Ou-Young v. County of Santa Clara We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2023mc80222
Plaintiff: Kuang-Bao Paul Ou-Young
Defendant: County of Santa Clara, Jeffrey F. Rosen, John Chase and others
Kuang-Bao Ou-Young v. USDC-CASJ
as 23-70016
Not Classified By Court: In re: KUANG-BAO OU-YOUNG, COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA, JEFFREY F. ROSEN, District Attorney, County of Santa Clara and others
Petitioner: KUANG-BAO OU-YOUNG
Respondent: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN JOSE
Kuang-Bao Ou-Young v. USDC-CASJ
as 23-70035
Not Classified By Court: In re: KUANG-BAO OU-YOUNG, COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA, JEFFREY F. ROSEN, District Attorney, County of Santa Clara and others
Petitioner: KUANG-BAO OU-YOUNG
Respondent: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN JOSE
S. Mendel v. Liane Randolph, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 21-15910
Defendant: ELAINE L. CHAO, in her official capacity as U.S. Secretary of Transportation, ANNE KRAMER, Attorney of the law firm Lichten & Liss-Riordan, P.C., MICHAEL PICKER, in his individual and official capacity as President, Commissioner, California Public Utilities Commission and others
Defendant / Appellee: CLIFFORD RECHTSCHFFEN, in his indiviual and official capacity as Commissioner, California Public Utilities Commission, UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., MARITZA PEREZ, in her individual and official capacity as Section Supervisor Badge #11 Transportationb License Section California Public Utilities Commission and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: S. PATRICK MENDEL
Kuang-Bao Ou-Young v. Kamala Harris, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 21-15001
Defendant / Appellee: RICHARD SEEBORG, KIMBERLY MCCRICKARD, WILLIAM H. ORRICK and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: KUANG-BAO P. OU-YOUNG and KUANG-BAO OU-YOUNG
Kuang-Bao Ou-Young v. Edward LEAVY, et al
as 20-15691
Defendant / Appellee: CONSUELO M. CALLAHAN, Circuit Judge, United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, JAMES WARE, former Judge, U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California and as an Individual, KANDIS A. WESTMORE, former Magistrate District Judge, U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California and as an Individual and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: KUANG-BAO P. OU-YOUNG
S. Mendel v. Elaine Chao, et al
as 19-17380
Defendant / Appellee: LICHTEN & LISS-RIORDAN P.C., a law firm, RAYMOND MARTINEZ, in his official capacity as Adminisrator, Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration, CLIFFORD RECHTSCHFFEN, in his indiviual and official capacity as Commissioner, California Public Utilities Commission and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: S. PATRICK MENDEL
Kuang-Bao Ou-Young v. Edward LEAVY, et al
as 19-17031
Defendant / Appellee: RUTH BADER GINSBURG, U.S. Supreme Court Justice, and as an individual, SAMUEL CONTI, Former District Judge, U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, and his estate, MARY M. SCHROEDER, and as an individual and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: KUANG-BAO P. OU-YOUNG
S. Mendel v. USDC-CAOAK
as 19-72420
Not Yet Classified: MARITZA PEREZ, in her individual and official capacity as Section Supervisor Badge #11 Transportationb License Section California Public Utilities Commission, RAISER-CA LLC, ELAINE L. CHAO, in her official capacity as U.S. Secretary of Transportation and others
Petitioner: S. PATRICK MENDEL
Not Classified By Court: In re: S. PATRICK MENDEL
Respondent: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, OAKLAND

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?