Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Castello v. Quinstreet Pl, Inc.
as 3:2024cv00635
Plaintiff:
Michelle Castello
Defendant:
Quinstreet Pl, Inc. doing business as Amone
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Lyman v. Quinstreet, Inc.
as 5:2023cv05056
Plaintiff:
Maxx Lyman
Defendant:
Quinstreet, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Pizarro v. Quinstreet, Inc.
as 3:2022cv02803
Plaintiff:
Sharon Pizarro
Defendant:
Quinstreet, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Baker v. SunPower Corporation et al
as 5:2021cv00790
Plaintiff:
Tyler Baker
Defendant:
SunPower Corporation, Modernize Inc. and QuinStreet, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Baker v. QuinStreet Media, Inc.
as 3:2020cv05632
Plaintiff:
Tyler Baker
Defendant:
QuinStreet Media, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Ayman Mousa v. Quinstreet, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv01136
Defendant:
Does 1 through 10, inclusive, and each of them, Quinstreet, Inc. and Quinstreet, Inc. doing business as Debthelp.com
Plaintiff:
Ayman Mousa
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0227
Reed v. QuinStreet, Inc. et al
as 4:2018cv02517
Plaintiff:
William Reed
Defendant:
QuinStreet, Inc., Douglas Valenti and Gregory Wong
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Turner v. Quinstreet, Inc.
as 3:2018cv01486
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Turner
Defendant:
Quinstreet, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Mark Ferguson v. Active Response Group, et al
as 08-35709
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARK J. FERGUSON, a married individual doing business as Whew.com
Defendant:
ACTIVE RESPONSE GROUP, a New York company
Defendant - Appellee:
QUINSTREET INC., a California corporation
Ferguson v. Active Response Group et al
as 3:2007cv05378
Plaintiff:
Mark Ferguson and Mark Ferguson
Defendant:
Active Response Group, The Bradford Exchange LTD, Quinstreet Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
