Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Gold v. US Bancorp et al
as 3:2023cv01342
Plaintiff:
Michelle Gold, The Gold Family Trust, Star Martinez and others
Defendant:
J.P. Morgan Securities LLC, RBS Acceptance Inc., RBS Financial Prodcuts Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Civil Remedies: Racketeering (RICO) Act
RBS Securities, Inc., et al v. USDC-CALA
as 14-72279
:
In re: RBS SECURITIES, INC. and RBS ACCEPTANCE, INC.
Petitioner:
RBS SECURITIES, INC. and RBS ACCEPTANCE, INC.
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, LOS ANGELES
Real Party In Interest:
NATIONAL CREDIT UNION ADMINISTRATION BOARD, As Liquidating Agent of Western Corporate Federal Credit Union, AMERICAN HOME MORTGAGE ASSTS, LLC, LARES ASSET SECURITIZATION, INC. and others
in re Subpoena Served on Paul Financial LLC
as 3:2014mc80149
Movant:
Royal Bank of Scotland Group plc , RBS Holdings USA Inc , RBS Securities Inc. and others
Respondent:
Paul Financial , LLC
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. § 0000
Eblovi et al v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Company et al
as 4:2013cv02314
Plaintiff:
David C. Eblovi and Monica K. Eblovi
Defendant:
Deutsche Bank National Trust Company , RBS Acceptance Inc, RBS Financial Products Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco v. Deutsche Bank Securities, Inc. et al
as 3:2010cv03039
Plaintiff:
Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco
Defendant:
Deutsche Bank Securities, Inc. , Deutsche Alt-A Securities, Inc. , DB Structured Products, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
v. Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco et al
as 3:2010cv03045
Plaintiff:
Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco
Defendant:
Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC, Credit Suisse First Boston Mortgage Securities Corp., Deutsche Bank Securities, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
