Other Statutes Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 102
Richmond v. Reese, et al.
as 24-1811
Plaintiff: MARSHALL CHARLES RICHMOND
Defendant: MICHAEL REESE, Multnomah County Sheriff, STEVEN ALEXANDER and KURTISS MORRISON
Juarez Zelaya v. City of Los Angeles, et al.
as 23-4186
Plaintiff / Appellee: NICOLE JUAREZ ZELAYA, Individually and as Successor in Interest to Decedent, Jacobo Juarez Cedillo
Defendant / Appellant: CITY OF LOS ANGELES, DUSTIN RICHMOND and JOSEPH HUNT
Matthew E. Orso v. Todd Disner et al
as 2:2023cv06551
Plaintiff: Matthew E. Orso in his capacity as court-appointed Receiver for Rex Venture Group LLC doing business as ZeekRewards.com
Petitioner: Nationwide Judgment Recovery Inc
Defendant: Todd Disner, Trudy Gilmond, Trudy Gilmond, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Caswell County, North Carolina et al v. McKinsey and Company, Inc.
as 3:2022cv07038
Plaintiff: Caswell County, North Carolina et al, CITY OF GREENSBORO, NORTH CAROLINA, DAVIE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA and others
Defendant: McKinsey and Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Grimsley et al v. Nike Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv01574
Defendant: Inmate Calling Solutions, Valley Family Health Care, Citizens United for the Rehabilitation of Errants and others
Plaintiff: Robert Alexander Grimsley, Leonardo Rafael Urquijo Arvizu, Steven Tyler Premo and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Synder, et al. v. Boise County, et al. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv00350
Plaintiff: Eric Synder, Kevin Van Horn, Dawn Hurd and others
Defendant: Boise County and Boise County Board of Commissioners
Intervenor Defendant: Horizon Tower, LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 153 Telecommunications Act of 1966
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv01125
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
OptumRX Inc. v. Richmond Hill Pharmacy Inc.
as 8:2022cv00562
Petitioner: OptumRX Inc.
Respondent: Richmond Hill Pharmacy Inc.
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0001 U.S. Arbitration Act
OptumRX Inc. v. A & S Drugs LLC We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 8:2022cv00468
Petitioner: OptumRX Inc.
Respondent: A & S Drugs LLC and A and S Drugs LLC
Consolidated Defendant: Mytillini Enterprises, The Casey Group, Beatties Community Pharmacy Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0001 U.S. Arbitration Act
Rayquel Wilson v. City of Richmond
as 21-16970
Plaintiff / Appellant: RAYQUEL WILSON
Defendant / Appellee: CITY OF RICHMOND

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?