Cases 1 - 10 of 279
Rhodes v. Ford
as 24-3106
Plaintiff:
KAVIN MAURICE RHODES
Defendant:
D. FORD, LTA, D. LUNSFORD, SSA, K. ROYAL and others
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau et al. v. Stratfs, LLC et al.
as 2:2024ms00010
Defendant:
Stratfs, LLC, Strategic Client Support, Anchor Client Services, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, The People of the State of New York, Attorney General of the State of New York and others
Receiver:
Thomas W. McNamara
Duraisamy v. Sairam Babu, et al.
as 24-457
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NAGARAJAN DURAISAMY
Defendant / Appellee:
PRADEEP PULI RUKMANGATHA SAIRAM BABU, KOUSALYA NAGARAJAN, HCL TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED and others
Victoria Tenisha Shanae Dillihunt v. Knights Templar Commandery et al
as 5:2024cv00033
Defendant:
Fredro Starr, Knights Tempar Commandery Zone 12, Southgate, CA and others
Plaintiff:
Victoria Tenisha Dillihunt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Nah v. Jablon, et al.
as 23-4003
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAE S. NAH
Defendant / Appellee:
ANDREW V. JABLON, MYCHAEL E. BYERTS, RESCH POLSTER & BERGER, LLP and others
Nair, et al. v. Toth, et al.
as 23-3682
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAYAKUMAR SUNDARAN NAIR, RAJAKUMARI SUSHEELKUMAR, JAYAKRISHNAN K NAIR and others
Defendant / Appellee:
ALEX TOTH, PAUL LEE, DJ VYZIS and others
McCarthy, et al. v. Intercontinental Exchange, Inc., et al.
as 23-3458
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LISA MCCARTHY, MARY KATHERINE ARCELL, KEITH DEAN BRADT and others
Defendant / Appellee:
INTERCONTINENTAL EXCHANGE, INC., INTERCONTINENTAL EXCHANGE HOLDINGS, INC., ICE BENCHMARK ADMINISTRATION LIMITED and others
Defendant:
ROYAL BANK OF CANADA, RBC CAPITAL MARKETS, LLC and THE NORINCHUKIN BANK
Los Angeles Waterkeeper v. Royal White Cement, Inc.
as 2:2023cv08983
Plaintiff:
Los Angeles Waterkeeper
Defendant:
Royal White Cement, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1319 Clean Water Act
Duraisamy v. Sairam Babu et al
as 3:2023cv04620
Defendant:
Thiruvenkatasamy, Senthilrajan, Pradeep Puli Rukmangatha Sairam Babu and others
Plaintiff:
Nagarajan Duraisamy
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Jae S. Nah v. Andrew V. Jablon et al
as 2:2023cv06909
Plaintiff:
Jae S. Nah
Defendant:
Andrew V. Jablon, Mychael E. Byerts, Resch Pollster and Berger LLP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
