Cases 1 - 10 of 106
Phyllis Saxon, et al v. City of Dillon, et al
as 21-35038
Defendant / Appellee:
PAUL CRAFT, Dillon Police Chief; in his individual and official capacity, JOSEPH HORROCKS, Officer; in his individual and official capacity, CITY OF DILLON, Montana, a body politic and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SANDRA IVERSON, OLD WEST SALOON, LLC and PHYLLIS SAXON
Plaintiff:
THE METLEN HOTEL
Defendant:
JOHN DOES, I-X
In the Matter of Sean Gardner Saxon - #230054
as 3:2019mc80114
Respondent:
Sean Gardner Saxon
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Deutsche Bank National Trust v. SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC, et al
as 19-15855
Defendant / Appellee:
SFR INVESTMENTS POOL 1, LLC, NEVADA ASSOCIATION SERVICES, INC. and HEATHER GLEN HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY, as Trustee for Saxon Asset Securities Trust 2007-3, Mortgage Loan Asset Backed Certificates, Series 2007-3
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv05811
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv00851
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv02519
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv01616
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 14-16205
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Shane Valdez v. Saxon Mortgage Services, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv03595
Defendant:
American Security Insurance Company, Assurant, Inc., Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas and others
Plaintiff:
Shane Valdez
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
