Other Statutes Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 1,003
Hall v. Treasurer of the United States, et al.
as 24-3199
Plaintiff: GWENDOLYN HALL
Defendant: TREASURER OF THE UNITED STATES, APPLE INC., T-MOBILE US, INC. and others
Albertini, et al. v. San Diego County Sheriff's Department, et al.
as 24-2101
Plaintiff: CATHERINE E ALBERTINI, Wife and GREGORY E ALBERTINI, SR., Husband
Defendant: SAN DIEGO COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, SAN DIEGO SUPERIOR COURT, ANNE ACEBO-HOULIHAN and others
Harris v. Ely State Prison Staff, et al.
as 24-1699
Defendant / Appellee: WILLIAM REUBART
Plaintiff: AMMAR HARRIS
Defendant: ELY STATE PRISON STAFF, STEVEN SISOLAK, BARBARA CEGAVSKE and others
Campbell v. Dickey
as 24-1420
Plaintiff: ANTHONY TYRONE CAMPBELL, SR.
Defendant: P. DICKEY
Pelletier v. United States District Court for the District of Nevada, Las Vegas
as 24-1338
Interested Party: ROBERT MURPHY, CHRISTOPHER PELLETIER, JAMES MASSETT, SR. and others
Petitioner: GREGG PELLETIER
Respondent: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEVADA, LAS VEGAS
Stevens v. Stevens et al
as 3:2024cv00411
Plaintiff: Coralie Jane Stevens
Defendant: Nicole Marie Stevens, Wesley Allen Ream, Jr., Wesley Allen Ream, Sr. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Gregory Flynn, Sr. v. West Coast Windows and Home Improvement
as 5:2024cv00406
Plaintiff: Gregory Flynn, Sr.
Defendant: West Coast Windows and Home Improvement
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Harris v. Daniels, et al.
as 24-878
Plaintiff: AMMAR HARRIS
Defendant: CHARLES DANIELS, BRIAN WILLIAMS, SR., MICHAEL MINEV and others
Pelletier v. Pelletier, et al.
as 24-773
Defendant: ROBERT MURPHY, CHRISTOPHER PELLETIER, JAMES MASSETT, SR. and others
Plaintiff: GREGG PELLETIER
United States of America v. Scott
as 24-733
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: LUKE JOHN SCOTT, SR.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?