Cases 1 - 10 of 24
Sayre Area School District v. Meta Platforms Inc. et al
as 4:2023cv02100
Plaintiff:
Sayre Area School District
Defendant:
Meta Platforms Inc., Facebook Holdings, LLC, Facebook Operations, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Sayre Area School District v. JUUL Labs, Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv00500
Plaintiff:
Sayre Area School District
Defendant:
Juul Labs Inc., Altria Group Inc., Altria Client Services LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Latwahn McElroy v. Maureen McLean, et al
as 20-16586
Defendant / Appellee:
MAUREEN MCLEAN, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, M. SAYRE and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LATWAHN MCELROY
Latwahn McElroy v. USDC-CAOAK
as 20-72378
Not Classified By Court:
In re: LATWAHN MCELROY, M. SAYRE, MAUREEN MCLEAN and others
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, OAKLAND
Petitioner:
LATWAHN MCELROY
Paul Sayre v. Google, Inc.
as 19-17542
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PAUL JOSEPH SAYRE, Owner of Rdevice
Defendant / Appellee:
GOOGLE, INC.
Sayre v. Google, Inc.
as 3:2019cv02247
Plaintiff:
Paul Joseph Sayre
Defendant:
Google Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
Ashton Krukowski v. LVMPD, et al
as 19-15556
Defendant / Appellee:
WILLIAM FLINN, ERIC GOODMAN, MARIA JACKSON and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ASHTON KRUKOWSKI
Lewis Shaw v. L. Thomas, et al
as 19-15147
Defendant / Appellee:
L. THOMAS, C. SAYRE, RISENHOOVER and others
Defendant:
DORFMAN and M. HANSEN
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LEWIS D. SHAW
Bradley Sayre v. JPMorgan Chase & Co., et al
as 18-55411
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BRADLEY SAYRE
Defendant - Appellee:
JPMORGAN CHASE & CO., JP MORGAN CHASE SECURITIES, LLC, J.P. MORGAN SECURITIES, LLC and others
Bradley Sayre v. J.P. Morgan Securities, LLC
as 18-55412
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BRADLEY SAYRE
Defendant - Appellee:
J.P. MORGAN SECURITIES, LLC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
