Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Hunter v. Paterson, et al.
as 24-1291
Plaintiff:
DAVID SAMPSON HUNTER
Defendant:
STATE MEDIA PERPETRATORS, RICK ALFREAD MANDEVILLE, SCOTT JONES and others
Kate Adams v. County of Sacramento, et al
as 23-80042
Petitioner:
KATE ADAMS
Respondent:
COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO and SCOTT JONES, Sheriff
Kevin Hawkins v. Benjamin Wagner, et al
as 21-17099
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KEVIN T. HAWKINS, AKA Ket T. Hawkins
Defendant / Appellee:
BENJAMIN B. WAGNER, US Attorney, SCOTT W. MCGREGOR, US Attorney, TODD A. PICKLES, Assistant US Attorney and others
James Cupp, et al v. Kamala Harris, et al
as 21-16809
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES EDWARD CUPP and LAWRENCE HAVEN
Defendant / Appellee:
KAMALA D. HARRIS, XAVIER BECERRA and ROB BONTA
Defendant:
CITY OF CITRUS HEIGHTS, CHRISTOPHER W. BOYD, CHRISTIAN BAERRESEN and others
Patrick Brady v. Scott Jones, et al
as 21-16386
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PATRICK BRADY
Defendant / Appellee:
SCOTT JONES, Sheriff, ERIK MANESS, Sheriff, BRANDON LUKE, Commander and others
Eric Alston, Jr. v. County of Sacramento, et al
as 21-15325
Defendant / Appellee:
SCOTT JONES, Sheriff, MADRIAGO, Deputy, #1337, COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ERIC ANTHONY ALSTON, Jr.
Kenard Thomas v. County of Sacramento, et al
as 20-16443
Defendant / Appellee:
SCOTT JONES, NICHOLAS RUSSELL and COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KENARD THOMAS
David Hunter, et al v. Scott Jones, et al
as 20-15990
Defendant / Appellee:
JACKSON, Badge #713 and SCOTT JONES
Plaintiff:
DEANDRE FOWLER
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID SAMPSON HUNTER
Eric Alston , Jr. v. County of Sacramento, et al
as 19-16225
Defendant / Appellee:
SCOTT JONES, Sheriff, MADRIAGO, Deputy, #1337, COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ERIC ANTHONY ALSTON, Jr.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv00055
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
