Cases 1 - 10 of 101
Buchwalter v. Twitter, Inc., et al.
as 24-3684
Plaintiff:
GREGG BUCHWALTER, Individually And On Behalf Of All Others Similarly Situated
Defendant:
TWITTER, INC., Delaware corporation; Successor X Corp, GOOGLE LLC, a limited liability company, ALPHABET INC., a Delaware corporation and others
Banco Azteca
as 5:2024mc80091
Plaintiff:
Banco Azteca
Not Yet Classified:
Meta, Twitter, Inc., Google LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
X CORP., Successor in Interest to TWITTER, INC. v. Bonta
as 24-271
Plaintiff / Appellant:
X CORP., SUCCESSOR IN INTEREST TO TWITTER, INC.
Defendant / Appellee:
ROBERT BONTA, in his official capacity as Attorney General of California
Doe 1, et al. v. Twitter, Inc., et al.
as 24-177
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN DOE 1 and JOHN DOE 2
Defendant / Appellee:
TWITTER, INC. and X CORP., SUCCESSOR IN INTEREST TO TWITTER, INC.
Morgan v. Twitter, Inc.
as 23-3764
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GLEN MORGAN, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Defendant / Appellee:
TWITTER, INC.
Ma v. Twitter, Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv03301
Petitioner:
Fabien Ho Ching Ma
Respondent:
Twitter, Inc. and X Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 185 Suit to Compel Arbitration
Roadget Business Pte. Ltd. v. Twitter, Inc.
as 4:2023mc80176
Plaintiff:
Roadget Business Pte. Ltd.
Defendant:
Twitter, Inc.
hey, inc. v. Twitter, Inc.
as 23-15911
Plaintiff / Appellee:
HEY, INC.
Defendant / Appellee:
TWITTER, INC.
Petitioner / Appellant:
JOHN DOE 1 and JOHN DOE 2
Al-Sadhan et al v. Twitter Inc. et al
as 4:2023cv02369
Defendant:
Ahmed Almutairi, Twitter Inc., Kingdom of Saudi Arabia and others
Plaintiff:
Areej Al-Sadhan and Abdulrahman Al-Sadhan
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Silva v. X CORP., Successor in Interest to TWITTER, INC.
as 4:2023mc80122
Plaintiff:
Riccardo Silva
Defendant:
X CORP., Successor in Interest to TWITTER, INC.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
