Other Statutes Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 102
RSS Feed | View as table | Sort by last update
Rebekka Lien v. Uber Technologies, Inc.
as 2:2024cv02961
Plaintiff: Rebekka Lien
Defendant: Uber Technologies, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Vinita Jayant v. Uber Technologies, Inc.
as 2:2024cv02962
Plaintiff: Vinita Jayant
Defendant: Uber Technologies, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Karla Uribe v. Uber Technologies, Inc.
as 2:2024cv02851
Plaintiff: Karla Uribe
Defendant: Uber Technologies, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Uber Technologies, Inc., et al. v. United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation
as 23-3445
Petitioner: UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., RASIER, LLC and RASIER-CA, LLC
Respondent: UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL ON MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION
Not Classified By Court: JANE DOE LS 340, an individual, KATHERINE HYLIN, an individual, E. R., an individual and others
M.F.A. v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv05560
Plaintiff: M.F.A.
Defendant: Uber Technologies Inc. and Raiser L.L.C.
M.F.A. v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv08115
Plaintiff: M.F.A.
Defendant: Uber Technologies, Inc., Raiser, LLC.,, DOES 1 through 50, Inclusive and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2023cv02511
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Cao v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al
as 4:2022cv04688
Plaintiff: Dongping Cao
Defendant: Uber Technologies, Inc., Dara Khosrowshahi and Nelson Chai
Boston Retirement System, et al v. Uber Technologies, Inc., et al
as 22-80076
Respondent: BOSTON RETIREMENT SYSTEM, DAVID MESSINGER, ELLIE MARIE TORONTO ESA and others
Petitioner: UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., DARA KHOSROWSHAHI, NELSON CHAI and others
Gill et al v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2022cv04379
Plaintiff: Taje Gill, Esterphanie St. Juste and Benjamin Valdez
Defendant: Uber Technologies, Inc. and Lyft, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?