Other Statutes Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 394
Tohono O'odham Nation, et al. v. United States Department of the Interior, et al.
as 24-3659
Plaintiff: TOHONO O'ODHAM NATION, SAN CARLOS APACHE TRIBE, ARCHAEOLOGY SOUTHWEST and others
Defendant: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, DEB HAALAND and UNITED STATES BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT
Intervenor: SUNZIA TRANSMISSION, LLC
Chinook Indian Nation, et al. v. Haaland, et al.
as 24-3629
Plaintiff: CHINOOK INDIAN NATION, an Indian Tribe and a Washington non-profit corporation, and as successor-in-interest to The Lower Band of Chinook Indians, ANTHONY A. JOHNSON, individually and in his capacity as Chairman of the Chinook Indian Nation and CONFEDERATED LOWER CHINOOK TRIBES AND BANDS
Defendant: DEB HAALAND, in her capacity as Secretary of the U.S. Department of Interior, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, OFFICE OF FEDERAL ACKNOWLEDGMENT and others
Leigh, et al. v. Raby, et al.
as 24-3534
Plaintiff: LAURA LEIGH, WILD HORSE EDUCATION, ANIMAL WELLNESS ACTION and others
Defendant: JON RABY, Nevada State Director of the Bureau of Land Management, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR and UNITED STATES BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT
Center for Biological Diversity, et al. v. United States Department of the Interior, et al.
as 24-3397
Petitioner: CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY and SIERRA CLUB
Respondent: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, DEBRA HAALAND, Secretary of the U.S. Department of Interior, NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE and others
The Northern Cheyenne Tribe v. The United States of America et al
as 1:2024cv00052
Plaintiff: The Northern Cheyenne Tribe
Defendant: The United States of America, United States Department of the Interior, Bureau of Indian Affairs and others
Cause Of Action: 25 U.S.C. § 640 Indian Tribal Rights
Tohono O'odham Nation, et al. v. United States Department of the Interior, et al.
as 24-2778
Plaintiff: TOHONO O'ODHAM NATION, SAN CARLOS APACHE TRIBE, ARCHAEOLOGY SOUTHWEST and others
Defendant: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, DEB HAALAND, U.S. Secretary of Interior and UNITED STATES BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT
Intervenor: SUNZIA TRANSMISSION, LLC
Alaska Industrial Development and Export Authority, et al. v. Biden, et al.
as 24-2533
Plaintiff: ALASKA INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AND EXPORT AUTHORITY, NORTH SLOPE BOROUGH, ARCTIC SLOPE REGIONAL CORPORATION and others
Intervenor: STATE OF ALASKA, NATIVE VILLAGE OF VENETIE TRIBAL GOVERNMENT, VENETIE VILLAGE COUNCIL and others
Defendant: JOSEPH R. BIDEN, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, DEB HAALAND, in her official capacity as Secretary of the Department of Interior and others
Western Watersheds Project et al v. United States Fish and Wildlife Service et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 9:2024cv00043
Plaintiff: Western Watersheds Project, International Wildlife Coexistence Network, WildEarth Guardians and others
Defendant: Martha Williams, United States Fish and Wildlife Service, Deb Haaland and others
Intervenor: Sportsmen's Alliance Foundation, Safari Club International and Rocky Mountain Elk Foundation
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 1538 Endangered Species Act
Morrison v. United States Department of the Interior, et al.
as 24-2127
Plaintiff: JAMES MORRISON
Defendant: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, KALA MCKINNEY, JOHN GRINSELL and others
United States of America et al v. General Recycling of Washington LLC et al
as 2:2024cv00329
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ON BEHALF OF THE NATIONAL OCEANIC AND ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION AND THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, The State of Washington through the Washington Department of Ecology, Muckleshoot Indian Tribe and others
Defendant: General Recycling of Washington, LLC, The David J. Joseph Company, Nucor Steel Seattle, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1365 Environmental Matters

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?