Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Jeremiah Balik v. City of Las Vegas, et al
as 21-16889
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JEREMIAH WILLIAM BALIK
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF LAS VEGAS, CITY OF NORTH LAS VEGAS, CALIFORNIA HIGHWAY PATROL and others
Deborah Cooney v. City of San Diego, et al
as 19-16180
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF WHITE SULPHUR SPRINGS, CHRISTOPHER JACOBS, AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF STATE TROOPERS and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DEBORAH COONEY
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv02531
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Chas Jackson et al v. Whole Foods Market, Inc.
as 2:2014cv06705
Plaintiff:
Chas Jackson and Josh Koffman
Defendant:
Mrs Gooch's Natural Foods Markets Inc, WFM Private Label L.P., WFM-WO Inc and others
Mains v. Whole Food Market, Inc.
as 5:2012cv05652
Plaintiff:
Robert Pratt
Defendant:
Whole Food Market, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Gail Hodes, et al v. Van's International Foods, et al
as 09-80135
Petitioner:
GAIL HODES, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, ELAINE GOODFRIEND, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and RUTH STROUD, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Respondent:
VAN'S INTERNATIONAL FOODS, a California Corporation, HEALTHY FOOD HOLDINGS, INC., a Delaware Corporation, WHOLE FOODS MARKET CALIFORNIA, INC., a California corporation and others
Gail Hodes et al v. Van's International Foods et al
as 2:2009cv01530
Plaintiff:
Gail Hodes, Gail Hodes, Gail Hodes and others
Defendant:
Van's International Foods, Van's International Foods, Van's International Foods and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Federal Trade Commission v. Whole Foods Market, Inc. et al
as 3:2007mc09152
Plaintiff:
Federal Trade Commission
Defendant:
Whole Foods Market, Inc. and Wild Oats Markets, Inc.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
