Cases 1 - 10 of 120
Zepeda-Dionicio, et al. v. Garland
as 24-4869
Petitioner:
MARTHA DEL CARMEN MORALES-ZEPEDA and DINA MAGALY ZEPEDA-DIONICIO
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Nguyen v. Williams, et al.
as 24-3844
Plaintiff:
DAI NGUYEN
Defendant:
K. WILLIAMS, Counselor, CC2, D. ZEPEDA, Counselor, D. GRAY, Counselor and others
Pena, et al. v. Garland
as 24-3618
Petitioner:
OSMAN FELICIANO PENA, OSMAN PENA-ZEPEDA, HERMINIA NATALY ZEPEDA-PEREZ and others
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Martinez Olivares, et al. v. Garland
as 24-3574
Petitioner:
KENER GUSTAVO MARTINEZ OLIVARES, MARI JOSE MARTINEZ ZEPEDA, NIKOL MONSERRATH MARTINEZ ZEPEDA and others
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Armida De Castro Henriquez v. Myrna Castro O'Bara et al
as 2:2024cv03151
Plaintiff:
ARMIDA DE CASTRO HENRIQUEZ
Defendant:
MYRNA CASTRO O'BARA, JOHN O'BARA, 1013 INVESTMENTS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv00531
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Zepeda-Martinez, et al. v. Garland
as 23-3906
Petitioner:
LUIS FELIPE ZEPEDA-MARTINEZ, ARLENA SARAHI DOMINGUEZ-FUNEZ and ENOC ZEPEDA-DOMINGUEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Columbia Legal Services, et al. v. Stemilt AG Services, LLC
as 23-3548
Plaintiff:
MARGARITO FIERRO CORDERO, FERNANDO MENDEZ FRANCO, JOSE RODRIGUEZ LLERENAS and others
Defendant / Appellee:
STEMILT AG SERVICES, LLC
Not Yet Classified:
COLUMBIA LEGAL SERVICES, counsel for plaintiffs
Lopez de Avila, et al. v. Garland
as 23-3358
Petitioner:
ERIKA LIZETH AVILA DE LOPEZ, RENE MAURICIO LOPEZ ZEPEDA and MAYBELLINE NATHALIA LOPEZ AVILA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv08044
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
