Cases 31 - 40 of 945
Clemmer v. Secretary of the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development
as 3:2023cv01044
Plaintiff:
David L. Clemmer
Defendant:
Secretary of the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
US Bank National Association v. Foley et al
as 3:2023cv01029
Plaintiff:
US Bank National Association
Defendant:
David R. Foley and Lisa L. Foley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Foley v. US Bank National Association et al
as 3:2023cv00877
Plaintiff:
David R. Foley
Defendant:
US Bank National Association, Truman 2016 SC6 Title Trust and Attorney Lender Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Michelle Klinker, et al v. Johnson & Johnson, et al
as 23-15220
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHELLE KLINKER and DAVID KLINKER
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON and ETHICON, INC.
IH3 Property West, LP v. David Jarrell
as 2:2023cv00685
Plaintiff:
IH3 Property West, LP
Defendant:
David Jarrell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Gold Standard Asset Management, LLC v. David Cox et al
as 2:2023cv00547
Plaintiff:
Gold Standard Asset Management, LLC
Defendant:
David Cox and Does 1 to 10
Matthew Katz v. David Katz
as 23-35016
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MATTHEW KATZ
Defendant / Appellee:
DAVID KATZ
David Choi v. Raul Tecu et al
as 2:2023cv00030
Plaintiff:
David Choi
Defendant:
Raul Tecu and Does 1 to 10
Bingham et al v. Specialized Loan Servicing LLC et al
as 2:2023cv00008
Plaintiff:
David Bingham and Sharon Bingham
Defendant:
Specialized Loan Servicing LLC, Quality Loan Service Corp of Washington and US Bank NA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444 Petition for Removal- Foreclosure
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 2:2023cv00007
Plaintiff:
David Bingham
Defendant:
Specialized Loan Servicing LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Foreclosure
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
