Cases 41 - 50 of 141
Tianne Henderson v. JP Morgan Chase Bank NA et al
as 5:2013cv01293
Defendant:
Does and JP Morgan Chase Bank NA
Plaintiff:
Tianne Henderson
James A Badame et al v. JP Morgan Chase Bank NA et al
as 2:2013cv04673
Plaintiff:
Diane M Badame and James A Badame
Defendant:
Does and JP Morgan Chase Bank NA
Allen Riedel et al v. JP Morgan Chase Bank NA et al
as 5:2013cv01146
Defendant:
Does, EMC Mortgage LLC and JP Morgan Chase Bank NA
Plaintiff:
Allen Riedel and Anna Riedel
Jeffrey Schneidereit, et al v. San Luis Capital, Inc., et al
as 13-56074
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JEFFREY SCHNEIDEREIT and ADELE M. SCHNEIDEREIT
Defendant - Appellee:
SAN LUIS CAPITAL, INC., CHAD VAN TIL, MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, INC. and others
Guy et al v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A., et al
as 2:2013cv00978
Plaintiff:
Bernard K Guy and Carol Lynne Buchannan Guy
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank NA and Does 1-20
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Anthony Teresi v. Tom Bohl et al
as 2:2013cv03950
Defendant:
Tom Bohl, Judge Philip S Gutierrez, JP Morgan Chase Bank NA and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony Teresi
Daisy Trust v. JP Morgan Chase Bank NA et al
as 2:2013cv00966
Defendant:
Claire Ali, JP Morgan Chase Bank NA and MTC Financial, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Daisy Trust
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444 Petition for Removal- Foreclosure
Cris Markey v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, NA, et al
as 13-15971
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CRIS J. MARKEY
Defendant - Appellee:
JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, NA and NATIONAL DEFAULT SERVICING CORPORATION
Shu Di Chen v. California Reconveyance Company et al
as 2:2013cv03197
Defendant:
All Persons Unknown, California Reconveyance Company, Does and others
Plaintiff:
Shu Di Chen
Estribor v. Mountain States Mortgage et al
as 3:2013cv05297
Plaintiff:
Freddie E. Estribor
Defendant:
Mountain States Mortgage, JP Morgan Chase Bank, NA , Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
