Cases 31 - 36 of 36
Hall et al v. Rocha et al
as 3:2011cv00511
Plaintiff:
Megan Hall and Scott Hall
Defendant:
Ruben Rocha, United States Department of Homeland Security , United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
You Wang, et al v. USA, et al
as 11-55198
Plaintiff - Appellant:
YOU THENG WANG and SHE-YING WANG
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY and IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT
Defendant:
JOHN W. WALTER
Sergio Guitron v. United States Department of Homeland Security et al
as 2:2010cv06440
Defendant:
Does, Harry Reynolds, Jr., United States Department of Homeland Security and others
Plaintiff:
Sergio Guitron
Timothy J Beach v. United States Department of Homeland Security Citizenship and Immigration Services et al
as 2:2008cv00420
Plaintiff:
Timothy J Beach
Defendant:
United States Department of Homeland Security Citizenship and Immigration Services, United States Department of Homeland Security Freedom of Information Act, United States Department of Homeland Security Immigration and Customs Enforcement and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Cornell v. United States of America et al
as 9:2007cv00022
Plaintiff:
Paula Cornell, Paula Cornell and Paula Cornell
Defendant:
United States of America, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Nathan Lee Albertson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Momeni v. Chertoff, et al
as 07-55018
Petitioner - Appellant:
KAMBIZ MOMENI
Respondent - Appellee:
MICHAEL CHERTOFF, Secretary, United States Department of Homeland Security, JULIE L. MYERS, Assistant Secretary for US Immigration and Customs Enforcement, United States Department of Homeland Security, JOHN P. TORRES, Acting Director, Office of Detention and Removal, US Immigration and Customs Enforcement and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
