Torts - Injury Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 41 - 50 of 56
Sara Wolfin et al v. Mojave Desert Racing, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv06376
Defendant: Does, MDR Productions, Inc., Mojave Desert Racing, Inc. and others
Cross Defendant: Does 1-100 inclusive, MDR Productions, Inc., Mojave Desert Racing, Inc. and others
Cross Claimant: Brett Sloppy
Plaintiff: Karen Wolfin, Karen Wolfin, Sara Wolfin and others
Lynne M Sloppy v. MDR Productions, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv06141
Defendant: Black and White Municiple/County/State Entities, Bureau of Land Management, Does and others
Plaintiff: Jakob S. Bonnar, Jennifer L. Bonnar, Travis M. Bonnar and others
Cross Defendant: Bureau of Land Management, Department of the Interior, Does and others
Cross Claimant: Brett M. Sloppy
Bishop et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2012cv03042
Plaintiff: Judith Ann Bishop , Donald Bishop , Estrella Jo Cox and others
Defendant: American Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wolfin et al v. Mojave Desert Racing, Inc. et al
as 3:2011cv02329
Plaintiff: Sara Wolfin , Seth Wolfin and Karen Wolfin
Defendant: Mojave Desert Racing, Inc., MDR Productions, Inc., Brett Sloppy and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Ann L. Mayhew, et al v. Mattel, Inc., et al
as 10-55903
: In re: MATTEL, INC. TOY LEAD PAINT PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Plaintiff - Appellant: ROD UNDERHILL, Individually and on Behalf of Others Similarly Situated, LEAH DUNSMORE, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, ADAM LUTTENBERGER and others
Objector: CHASE THOMPSON
Defendant - Appellee: MATTEL, INC., FISCHER-PRICE, INC., TARGET CORPORATION and others
Movant: MEGAN POWELL and MORGAN POWELL
In re: Clyde Padgett v. Mattel, Inc., et al
as 10-55756
: In re: MATTEL, INC. TOY LEAD PAINT PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Plaintiff - Appellee: ANN L. MAYHEW, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, NICOLE B. WHITE, Individually and on Behalf of Others Similarly Situated, ROD UNDERHILL, Individually and on Behalf of Others Similarly Situated and others
Objector - Appellant: CLYDE FARREL PADGETT, Class Member
Objector: CHASE THOMPSON
Defendant - Appellee: MATTEL, INC.
Defendant: FISCHER-PRICE, INC., TARGET CORPORATION, TOYS "R" US, INC. and others
Movant: MEGAN POWELL and MORGAN POWELL
Julia Sweeney, et al v. Mattel, Inc., et al
as 10-55693
: In re: MATTEL, INC. TOY LEAD PAINT PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Appellant: JULIA A. SWEENEY
Objector: CHASE THOMPSON
Plaintiff - Appellee: ANN L. MAYHEW, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, ROD UNDERHILL, Individually and on Behalf of Others Similarly Situated, LEAH DUNSMORE, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated and others
Defendant - Appellee: MATTEL, INC.
Defendant: FISCHER-PRICE, INC., TARGET CORPORATION, TOYS "R" US, INC. and others
Movant: MEGAN POWELL and MORGAN POWELL
Chase Thompson, et al v. Mattel, Inc., et al
as 10-55609
: In re: MATTEL, INC. TOY LEAD PAINT PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Objector - Appellant: CHASE THOMPSON
Plaintiff - Appellee: ANN L. MAYHEW, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, NICOLE B. WHITE, Individually and on Behalf of Others Similarly Situated, ROD UNDERHILL, Individually and on Behalf of Others Similarly Situated and others
Defendant - Appellee: MATTEL, INC.
Defendant: FISCHER-PRICE, INC., TARGET CORPORATION, TOYS "R" US, INC. and others
Movant: MEGAN POWELL and MORGAN POWELL
Parnell et al v. County of Del Norte et al
as 3:2009cv04074
Plaintiff: Jessica Parnell and Michael R. Jones
Defendant: County of Del Norte, County of Del Norte, Del Norte County Sheriff and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Carroll v. Kotkin et al
as 2:2009cv01076
Plaintiff: Lacey Carroll and Lacey Carroll
Defendant: David Seth Kotkin and Jennifer Dillion
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?