Cases 51 - 60 of 81
Bane et al v. Taylor et al
as 2:2011at01312
Plaintiff:
Carol Bane and Kelly Lind
Defendant:
Lois Jane Taylor, Frances N. Taylor and Tom R Taylor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bane et al v. Taylor et al
as 2:2011cv02426
Plaintiff:
Carol Bane and Kelly Lind
Defendant:
Lois Jane Taylor , Frances N. Taylor and Tom R Taylor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Tammy Tousignant et al v. Gawker Media et al
as 8:2011cv01383
Defendant:
American Media Inc, Associated Newspapers Ltd, DOES and others
Plaintiff:
Connor Tousignant, Tammy Tousignant, Tanner Tousignant and others
Tom M Storbakken v. DePuy Orthopaedics Inc et al
as 2:2011cv04677
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics Inc, Does, Johnson and Johnson Services Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Tom M Storbakken
Samuel Taylor et al v. Astrazeneca Pharmaceuticals LP et al
as 2:2011cv04420
Defendant:
Astra USA Inc, Astrazeneca AB, Astrazeneca LP and others
Plaintiff:
Samuel Taylor, George Teynor, Dauphine Thomas and others
Marcel Ming et al v. Pfizer Inc et al
as 2:2011cv02932
Plaintiff:
Michael Ahnemiller, Stephen Banwart, Francisco Bentancourt and others
Defendant:
Does, McKesson Corporation and Pfizer Inc
Carlos F Bell v. Alex Kozinsky et al
as 2:2011cv02610
Defendant:
LAPD CH Beck, Atty Gen Gov Jerry Brown, m g Sean J Byrne and others
Plaintiff:
Carlos F Bell
Kassimer et al v. Kerr Investment Holding Corporation et al
as 3:2011cv00549
Plaintiff:
Sarah Kassimer and Tom Kassimer
Defendant:
Kerr Investment Holding Corporation , Iovate Health Sciences, Inc. , Iovate Health Sciences USA, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Adams v. Easley et al
as 4:2011cv01219
Plaintiff:
Tyrone L. Adams
Defendant:
Charles L. Easley, Andrew J. Paulson, Etal and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Peter Hernandez v. United States of America, et al
as 2:2011cv00018
Plaintiff:
Peter Hernandez
Defendant:
Tom Dat Thai, United States Postal Service and United States of America
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
