Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Best et al v. Gerst et al
as 4:2024cv00010
Plaintiff:
Gordon Best, Kim Lavine-Best, Adam Best and others
Defendant:
Dietmar Gerst, B & D Walters Trucking, LTD and Does 1-3
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Motor Vehicle Product Liability
White v. Chadam, Inc. et al
as 6:2020cv00063
Defendant:
Adam Wallis Outfitter, Chadam, Inc. doing business as K Bar L Ranch, Does 1-50 and others
Plaintiff:
James M. White
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Adams v. Roberts
as 9:2018cv00148
Plaintiff:
Brendan E. Adams
Defendant:
Howard C. Roberts
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Johnson et al v. RE-EM Transportation Services, LTD et al
as 9:2016cv00049
Plaintiff:
Melba Sue Johnson , Robert Algood and Teresa Algood
Defendant:
RE-EM Transportation Services, LTD, 1338023 Alberta, LTD and Adam Boykiw
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Fiechtner v. Maricopa Integrated Health System
as 9:2011cv00014
Plaintiff:
Charles Adam Fiechtner, Sr
Defendant:
Maricopa Integrated Health System
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Fiechtner v. Golberg and Osborne
as 9:2011cv00015
Plaintiff:
Charles Adam Fiechtner, Sr
Defendant:
Golberg and Osborne, John Osborne and Bruce Squire
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Fiechtner v. Motor Vehicle Commissors
as 9:2011cv00012
Plaintiff:
Charles Adam Fiechtner, Sr
Defendant:
Motor Vehicle Commisors
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Fiechtner v. Bio Life Plasma Services
as 9:2011cv00013
Plaintiff:
Charles Adam Fiechtner, Sr
Defendant:
Bio Life Plasma Services, Julie Beck and Michael Kornish
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Fiechtner v. Highland Park Apts.
as 9:2011cv00016
Plaintiff:
Charles Adam Fiechtner, Sr
Defendant:
Highland Park Apts., Trevor Hill, Josh Burrows and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Fiechtner v. Cookies Market et al
as 9:2011cv00010
Plaintiff:
Charles Adam Fiechtner, Sr
Defendant:
Cookies Market, Charles Messina, Albert Messina and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
