Torts - Property Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Sharlene Shu, et al v. Toyota Motor Sales USA, Inc., et al
as 23-15717
Plaintiff / Appellee: SHARLENE SHU, MARK TENGOWSKI, ROMAN SIVION and others
Defendant / Appellant: TOYOTA MOTOR SALES USA, INC. and TOYOTA MOTOR NORTH AMERICA, INC.
David Shu v. USA, et al
as 22-16824
Plaintiff / Appellant: DAVID SHU
Defendant / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
David Shu v. USA, et al
as 22-16579
Plaintiff / Appellant: DAVID SHU
Defendant / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
Shu v. Toyota Motor Sales USA, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2022cv04661
Plaintiff: Sharlene Shu
Defendant: Toyota Motor Sales USA, Inc. and Toyota Motor North America, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Shu v. United States of America et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2020cv06536
Defendant: United States Postal Service and United States of America
Plaintiff: David Shu
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Tsan Sung Cheng v. Shu Jung Wu
as 5:2019cv02438
Plaintiff: TSAN SUNG CHENG
Defendant: SHU JUNG WU
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Shu v. Hutt et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2018cv00517
Defendant: Johnny Ala, Megan Brennan, Nancy Hutt and others
Plaintiff: David Shu
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
USA, et al v. Shu-Hwa Baran
as 16-56859
Plaintiff - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ex rel. Christopher Harrison and CHRISTOPHER HARRISON, an individual
Defendant - Appellant: SHU-HWA BARAN, individually and as Trustee of the Shu-Hwa Baran Trust
Huang Shu-Hui et al v. Merrill Lynch Pierce Fenner and Smith Incorporated
as 2:2011cv01123
Plaintiff: Hsu Ching-Hua, Hsu Ching-Yu, Chen Hsi-Chen and others
Defendant: Merrill Lynch Pierce Fenner and Smith Incorporated

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?