Cases 31 - 40 of 638
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00251
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400 Civil Rights of Handicapped Child
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-15737
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-15705
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-15648
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Spirit of Aloha Temple, et al v. County of Maui, et al
as 23-15647
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SPIRIT OF ALOHA TEMPLE, a Hawaii nonprofit corporation and FREDRICK R. HONIG
Defendant / Appellee:
COUNTY OF MAUI
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF HAWAII
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-15549
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-15515
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Planned Parenthood Great Northwest, Hawaii, Alaska, Indiana, Kentucky et al v. Labrador et al
as 1:2023cv00142
Plaintiff:
Planned Parenthood Great Northwest, Hawaii, Alaska, Indiana, Kentucky, Caitlin Gustafson and Darin Weyhrich
Defendant:
Raul Labrador, Members of the Idaho State Board of Medicine, Idaho State Board of Nursing and others
Amicus Curiae:
St. Luke's Health System Ltd., State of Arizona, State of California and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Other Civil Rights
Nahinu v. Naso et al
as 1:2023cv00148
Plaintiff:
Eliza-Mahealani Nahinu
Defendant:
Courtney Naso, Catherine Remigio, Denise Kawatachi and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00139
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
