Cases 51 - 60 of 74
O'Neal v. Sandovol et al
as 3:2013cv00304
Defendant:
Joanna Aucoin, John Berkich, Sherrie Betts and others
Plaintiff:
Jerry Lynn O'Neal
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lietke v. County of Montgomery et al
as 2:2013cv00547
Defendant:
County of Montgomery, D.T. Marshall, Reese McKinney and others
Plaintiff:
Bill Lietke
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv01906
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv01125
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Holmes v. Nye County et al
as 2:2010cv01794
Defendant:
David E. Boruchowitz, Tony De Meo, Investigator Marotta and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Ted Holmes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Slaughter v. American Arbitration Association et al
as 2:2010cv01437
Defendant:
American Arbitration Association, Lynn Cortinas, Sandra Marshall and others
Plaintiff:
Ronald Slaughter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Coulter v. Clark County Children Protection Services et al
as 2:2010cv01140
Defendant:
Tony Abbatangelo, Lisa Lashaye Barksdale, Dolphus Boucher and others
Plaintiff:
K.C. Keith Coulter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cooley v. Marshal et al
as 2:2009cv00559
Plaintiff:
Frederick Marc Cooley
Defendant:
J. Marshal and T. Mungie
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Moore v. Marshal
as 3:2009cv00098
Plaintiff:
Ronald Moore
Defendant:
Hugh Roy Marshal
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Meeks v. Town of Pahrump, et al.
as 2:2008cv01779
Plaintiff:
Carrol Leon Meeks
Defendant:
Town of Pahrump, Pahrump Valley-Fire Rescue Services, Office of Sheriff/Coroner of Nye County, Nevada and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
