Civil Rights Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Tene Carr v. Merrick Garland, et al
as 22-56135
Plaintiff / Appellant: TENE CARR
Defendant / Appellee: MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General, U.S. Attorney General
Defendant: FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION and DOES, 1-10 inclusive
Neil Scott v. Merrick Garland, et al
as 22-16355
Plaintiff / Appellant: NEIL SCOTT
Defendant / Appellee: MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General, U.S. Attorney General and BARBARA CEGAVSKE
Jamal Parker v. Antony Blinken, et al
as 22-16331
Plaintiff / Appellant: JAMAL DARIUS PARKER, Moor beneficiary, in personam, a Emperor, Admiral Marine, Merchant Piloter, AKA Jamal El Trust, DBA Jamal Darius Parker
Defendant / Appellee: ANTONY BLINKEN, Secretary of State, United States Department of State, Heirs and Assignees, DEBRA ANNE HAALAND, Secretary of the Interior, Department of the Interior, Heirs and Assignees, MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General, U.S. Department of Justice, Heirs and Assignees and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 10-35531
Plaintiff - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Type: Civil Rights Jobs
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 10-35250
Plaintiff - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Type: Civil Rights Jobs
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 09-55320
Plaintiff - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Type: Civil Rights Jobs
Nick Kolev v. Rabbi Davidi, et al
as 08-56790
Plaintiff - Appellant: NICK A. KOLEV, P.E. Ph.D.
Defendant: RABBI NISSIM DAVIDI, Administrator Rabbinical Council of California (RCC), RABBI MENACHEM GENACK, Rabbinic Administr Union of Orthodox Jewish Congregations (OU), THOMAS N. LEDVINA, Associate GC Office of the General Counsel and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?