Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00078
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv01653
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv01567
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Gypsum Resources LLC v. Clark County et al
as 2:2019cv00850
Plaintiff:
Gypsum Resources LLC
Defendant:
Board of Commissioners of Clark County and Clark County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Dolan et al v. Romano
as 3:2016cv00160
Counter Defendant:
Martha Hesse Dolan and Robert E. Dolan
Plaintiff:
Martha Hesse Dolan and Robert E. Dolan
ThirdParty Defendant:
Nevada Division of Water Resources
Defendant:
Thomas J Romano
ThirdParty Plaintiff:
Thomas J. Romano
Counter Claimant:
Thomas J. Romano
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv00449
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Unknown:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv01911
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Sager v. U.S. Government
as 2:2013cv00369
Defendant:
James Albanese, Victor J. Albanese, Area 51 and others
Plaintiff:
Margaret E. Sager, II
Cause Of Action: 48 U.S.C. § 1985 Conspiracy/Deprivation Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv02112
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv00234
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
