Cases 101 - 110 of 320
Matthews v. Williams et al
as 3:2018cv00560
Defendant:
William Reubart, Warden Filson, Nevada Department of Corrections and others
Plaintiff:
Ivan Lee Matthews and Ivan Lee Matthews, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Matthews v. Ely State Prison et al
as 3:2018cv00561
Defendant:
William Reubart, Ely State Prison, Warden Filson and others
Plaintiff:
Ivan Lee Matthews and Ivan Lee Matthews, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Matthews v. Ely State Prison et al
as 3:2018cv00563
Defendant:
Ely State Prison, Nevada Department of Corrections, Warden Filson and others
Plaintiff:
Ivan Lee Matthews and Ivan Lee Matthews, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Matthews v. Gentry et al
as 3:2018cv00564
Defendant:
Warden Reubart, Jo Gentry, Warden Filson and others
Plaintiff:
Ivan Lee Matthews and Ivan Lee Matthews, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mogg v. Dzurenda et al
as 2:2018cv02272
Plaintiff:
Cory Lee Mogg
Defendant:
Timothy Filson, J Guilin, Robert J Meares and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Matthews v. Ely State Prison et al
as 3:2018cv00550
Defendant:
Ely State Prison, William Gittere, Nevada Department of Corrections and others
Plaintiff:
Ivan Lee Matthews
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Matthews v. Gentry et al
as 3:2018cv00536
Defendant:
William Gittere, Nevada Department of Corrections, Jo Gentry and others
Plaintiff:
Ivan Lee Matthews
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Choate v. Weidick et al
as 2:2018cv01958
Defendant:
Karen West, James Dzarenda, Deanna Wright and others
Plaintiff:
Stephen Lee Choate
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Canterbury v. USA
as 2:2018cv01800
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Richard Lee Canterbury
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Nunn III v. Clark County Detention Center
as 2:2018cv01626
Defendant:
Clark County Detention Center
Plaintiff:
Sammie Lee Nunn, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
