Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in Oregon
Cases 111 - 120 of 10,321
Krivosheenko v. Beamer et al
as 3:2024cv01179
Defendant: Warren Roberts, State of Oregon, Leland Beamer and others
Plaintiff: Denis Krivosheenko
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bishop v. Marion County Jail
as 6:2024cv01178
Plaintiff: Travis Allan Bishop
Defendant: Marion County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dempsey v. Hanson
as 3:2024cv01173
Petitioner: Troy Caje Dempsey
Respondent: Jason Hanson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Taylor v. Yates
as 2:2024cv01172
Defendant: April Yates
Plaintiff: Jermel A. Taylor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Templeton v. Fhuere et al
as 6:2024cv01168
Petitioner: Mark Forest Templeton
Respondent: Corey Fhuere and Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. Multnomah County Inverness Jail
as 3:2024cv01163
Defendant: Multnomah County Inverness Jail
Plaintiff: Darrell Dwayne Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Capuia v. Real
as 6:2024cv01155
Defendant: Mike A. Real
Plaintiff: Cevelino Capuia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Taylor v. Oregon Department of Corrections
as 2:2024cv01151
Plaintiff: Jermel A. Taylor
Defendant: Oregon Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pinner v. Peters et al
as 3:2024cv01148
Plaintiff: Melodie Pinner
Defendant: Tony Kline, Heide Stewart, Colette Peters and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Martin v. Sundquist et al
as 3:2024cv01153
Plaintiff: Daniel Ross Martin
Defendant: DRCI Superintendent Sundquist, DRCI Medical Department and Ms. Carter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?