Cases 11 - 20 of 25
Greene et al v. Smith et al
as 3:2015cv00300
Plaintiff:
David Abbatt, Jonathan Albay, Taiwan Allen and others
Defendant:
James G. Cox, Nevada Attorney General and Nevada Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burton v. Alam
as 3:2015cv00274
Respondent:
Shanawar Alam
Petitioner:
Bobby E. Burton, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Burton v. Alam et al
as 2:2014cv01996
Respondent:
Shananwar Alam and Attorney General State of Nevada
Petitioner:
Bobby E Burton, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Fosmo v. County of Elko, Nevada et al
as 3:2014cv00468
Defendant:
Bobby Atkins, John Doe Bennett, DeeMar Dahl and others
Plaintiff:
Ryan Fosmo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robinson v. Nagel et al
as 3:2013cv00422
Defendant:
Mrs. Bobby and Mr. Nagel
Plaintiff:
Kirt D. Robinson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dodge v. State of Nevada et al
as 3:2012cv00478
Defendant:
Renee Baker, Board of Prison Commissioners, Gregory Cox and others
Plaintiff:
Bobby Dodge
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stroup v. Baker et al
as 3:2012cv00414
Respondent:
Renee Baker and Catherine Masto Cortez
Petitioner:
Bobby Jehu Stroup
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Stroup v. The State of Nevada
as 3:2012cv00264
Respondent:
Nevada, State Of
Petitioner:
Bobby Jehu Stroup
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Stroup v. Martin et al
as 3:2010cv00562
Defendant:
T. Jones and Gregory Martin
Plaintiff:
Bobby J. Stroup
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scott v. Williams et al
as 2:2009cv01934
Petitioner:
Bobby Scott, Jr.
Respondent:
Brian Williams and Attorney General of the State of Nevada
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
