Cases 11 - 20 of 32
Sloan v. Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2013cv00124
Plaintiff:
Johnny Lee Sloan
Defendant:
Department of Corrections, D. C. Battles, D. Asuncion and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rayshon Thomas v. Parties Calipatria C D C R et al
as 2:2012cv10220
Defendant:
Carlo Andreani, BBB etc Internia, Attorney General Edmund Brown, Sr and others
Plaintiff:
Rayshon Thomas
Abel Aguilar v. Tabitha L Raber et al
as 2:2012cv09181
Plaintiff:
Abel Aguilar, Jr
Defendant:
C D C Metro Sheriff Dept, Mike Meyers and Tabitha L. Raber
Patrick Williams v. Department of Corrections, et al
as 12-16651
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PATRICK WILLIAMS
Defendant - Appellee:
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, N. GRANNIS, D. C. KENNEDY and others
Jose Antonio Rodriguez v. D C F S of Los Angeles County et al
as 2:2011cv04673
Defendant:
D C F S of Los Angeles County and T. Morrison
Plaintiff:
Jose Antonio Rodriguez
Rodriguez v. D C F S of Los Angeles County et al
as 2:2011cv01407
Plaintiff:
Jose Antonio Rodriguez
Defendant:
D C F S of Los Angeles County and T. Morrison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anthony Robinson v. Anthony Lamarque, et al
as 10-17186
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTHONY L. ROBINSON
Defendant - Appellee:
ANTHONY A. LAMARQUE, Warden, M. MONTEIRO, Acting Associate Warden, Salinas Valley State Prison, P. MANDEVILLE, Correctional Captain and others
Boyden v. Small et al
as 3:2009cv02850
Plaintiff:
Tommy D. C. Boyden
Defendant:
Larry Small, R Madden and J Mudra
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stephen v. Antique et al
as 3:2009cv02678
Plaintiff:
Jimmie Stephen
Defendant:
Antique, Lee, Franseal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Boyden v. Small et al
as 3:2009cv02503
Plaintiff:
Tommy D. C. Boyden
Defendant:
Larry Small, M Dowling, T Borem and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
