Cases 11 - 20 of 3,028
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv03772
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Finley v. Stephanie, Well Path Medical Director
as 2:2024cv00840
Plaintiff:
Robert Lee Finley
Defendant:
Stephanie, Well Path Medical Director
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv03582
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 1156 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv03449
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Schulz et al v. Bean et al
as 2:2024cv00778
Plaintiff:
William Schulz and Toney A. White III
Defendant:
Jeremy Bean and NDOC Med Director
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McKinney v. Bean et al
as 2:2024cv00775
Plaintiff:
Anthony McKinney
Defendant:
Jeremy Bean, Dr. Avrom, Medical Director and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Oelker v. Idaho State Bar (ISB) et al
as 2:2024cv00770
Petitioner:
Jeromy Oelker
Respondent:
Idaho State Bar (ISB), Director Diane Minnich and Attorney Thomas Clark
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv00827
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Scott Joseph Faulkner v. County of Riverside et al
as 5:2024cv00799
Plaintiff:
Scott Joseph Faulkner
Defendant:
County of Riverside, Sheriff Chad Bianco, Medical Director Thomas Minahan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv03022
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
