Cases 11 - 20 of 45
Homer Tyrone Lewis v. J. D. Soto et al
as 2:2014cv04594
Defendant:
Butler, Butler, Dr. C. Cornell and others
Plaintiff:
Homer Tryone Lewis
Thomas Lee Gleason v. J Lopez et al
as 2:2013cv03791
Plaintiff:
Thomas Lee Gleason, Jr
Defendant:
J Lopez, J Lopez, J Ward and others
Bruce Koklich v. James Yates, et al
as 11-17886
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BRUCE KOKLICH
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES A. YATES, Warden, P. MENDOZA, Correctional Officer, CHAMNESS, Correctional Officer and others
Raymond Wright v. Ken Clark, et al
as 11-17548
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RAYMOND WRIGHT
Defendant:
KEN CLARK, SCOTT KEBAN, J. WARD and others
Defendant - Appellee:
LEFLER, FIGUEROA, GONZALEZ and others
Koklich v. Yates et al
as 1:2011cv01507
Defendant:
James A. Yates, P. Mendoza, Chamness and others
Plaintiff:
Bruce Koklich
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Koklich v. California Department of Corrections & Rebiliatation et al
as 1:2011cv01403
Plaintiff:
Bruce Koklich
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections & Rebiliatation , James A. Yates , P. Mendoza and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Koklich v. California Department of Corrections & Rebiliatation et al
as 1:2011at00503
Plaintiff:
Bruce Koklich
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections & Rebiliatation , James A. Yates , P. Mendoza and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Manriquez v. Tilton, et al
as 1:2011cv00537
Plaintiff:
Daniel Manriquez
Defendant:
James Tilton, J. Woodford, Sue Hubbart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vincent Bruce v. Jeanne Woodford, et al
as 11-15195
Plaintiff - Appellant:
VINCENT C. BRUCE
Defendant - Appellee:
JEANNE WOODFORD, DERRAL G. ADAMS, LYDIA HENSE and others
Crudup v. Ward et al
as 1:2010cv00934
Plaintiff:
Michael Crudup
Defendant:
J. Ward and M. Jericoff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
