Cases 11 - 20 of 25
McCallum v. Naughton et al
as 3:2019cv00243
Plaintiff:
James Kenneth McCallum
Defendant:
Dr. Naughton, Dr. Richardson and M.D. M. Minev
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Richardson v. Baker et al
as 3:2018cv00363
Defendant:
James Dzurenda, Renee Baker and Shelly Williams
Plaintiff:
Michael A Richardson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Richardson v. Nev. Dept. Corr. et al
as 3:2018cv00339
Defendant:
R Donnelly, Hometown Healthcare, Brian and others
Plaintiff:
Michael A Richardson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Richardson v. Huston et al
as 3:2018cv00280
Defendant:
Timothy Filson, Hammel, Robert Huston and others
Plaintiff:
Antwan Richardson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hendrix v. Ray et al
as 3:2018cv00053
Defendant:
Romeo Aranas, R Boone-Sharp, Ronald Bryant and others
Plaintiff:
Jamal Damon Hendrix
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Richardson v. Allen et al
as 3:2017cv00526
Defendant:
Chuck Allen, Nurse Eddie, Hahn and others
Plaintiff:
Arthur D. Richardson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hendrix v. Ray et al
as 2:2017cv01719
Defendant:
Romeo Aranas, S Boyer, Ronald Bryant and others
Plaintiff:
Jamal Damon Hendrix
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tagle v. Anderson et al
as 2:2016cv00757
Respondent:
Michael Anderson, Artinger, Renee Baker and others
Petitioner:
Victor Tagle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. State of Nevada ex rel. The Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2014cv00640
Defendant:
Dr. Romeo Aranas, Isidro Baca, Samuel Chapman and others
Plaintiff:
Danny Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Woodard v. Cox et al
as 2:2014cv00272
Defendant:
Romeo Aranas, Cheryl Burson, James Cox and others
Plaintiff:
Guy R. Woodard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
