Tagle v. Anderson et al
| Victor Tagle |
| Michael Anderson, Artinger, Renee Baker, Barfield, Regina Barrett, Rebecca Boyd, Andrew Bulfer, Harold Mike Byrne, Greg Cox, Crowder, Douglas, Dugan, Dunn, Garcia, Gregory, Hester, Howard, Jacobs, B Jefferson, Joseph, Karnez, Kerner, Lepak, Marey, Marino, Marques, E. K. McDaniel, Aaron Medina, Motouzek, Jennifer Nash, Nevada Department of Corrections, D. W. Neven, Ontiveros, Pascasio, Richardson, Jennice Salazar, Smith, Sotomayor, Stark, State of Nevada, Thompson, Saturnino Ulat, Resee Waldren, Ward, Bryan Williams, Witter and Zelaya |
| 2:2016cv00757 |
| April 5, 2016 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Las Vegas Office |
| Peggy A. Leen |
| James C. Mahan |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
180
ORDER denying 174 Motion to Intervene; ORDER denying 177 Motion to Intervene; Signed by Magistrate Judge Brenda Weksler on 2/4/2020. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JM)
|
|
Filing
170
ORDER rejecting as moot 156 Report and Recommendation; ORDER granting 162 Motion for Summary Judgment; Plaintiff's surreplies and the served defendants response (ECF Nos. 164, 166, 169) be, and the same hereby are, STRICKEN. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 6/26/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JM)
|
|
Filing
156
ORDER denying 137 Motion to Extend Time; ORDER denying 145 Motion; ORDER denying 153 Motion for Entry of Clerks Default. REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION Recommending Defendants Michael Anderson, David Joseph, Anthony Lepak, Clark Marcy, Pau lina Simmons, Stacey Stark, Smith, Howard, and Ward be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE pursuant to Rule 4(m). Objections to R&R due by 5/10/2019. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen on 4/26/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JM)
|
|
Filing
143
ORDER granting 95 Motion to Compel; ORDER granting 99 Motion to Strike; ORDER granting 132 Motion to Strike; Motions due by 5/16/2019.Plaintiff shall serve answers no later than 4/15/2019. Motions for summary judgment shall be file d and served no later than 5/16/2019. The parties shall file a joint pretrial order 30 days after the district judge enters a decision on motions for summary judgment. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen on 3/19/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JM)
|
|
Filing
130
ORDER denying 86 Motion; ORDER denying 87 Motion; ORDER denying 100 Motion; ORDER granting 103 Motion to Extend Time; ORDER denying 121 Motion; Signed by Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen on 2/22/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JM)
|
|
Filing
106
ORDER granting 104 Motion to Extend Time; Motion for Summary Judgment due by 12/17/2018. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 12/10/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JM)
|
|
Filing
12
ORDER denying 10 Motion to issue summons.; denying 11 Motion for District Judge to Reconsider Order.; Case terminated. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 1/6/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JM)
|
|
Filing
9
ORDER denying 1 Motion/Application for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; denying 7 Motion to Extend Time. It is further ordered that this action will be dismissed without prejudice unless plaintiff pays the $400.00 filing fee in full within thirty (30) days of entry of this order. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 12/1/2016. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF, cc: 2 Copies of Order to P - JM)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
