Cases 1 - 10 of 454
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00190
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
USA v. Zelaya-Funez
as 24-30120
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Victor Zelaya-Funez, also known as Victor Funes, also known as Vic F. Funes, also known as Victor.Funes3
Interlinc Mortgage Services, LLC v. Gilmore et al
as 2:2024cv00416
Plaintiff:
INTERLINC MORTGAGE SERVICES, LLC and Interlinc Mortgage Services LLC
Defendant:
Lisa Zelaya Gilmore and Trevor Gilmore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Gonzalez v. CoreCivic, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00087
Plaintiff:
Alexis Zelaya Gonzalez
Defendant:
CoreCivic, Inc., Correctional Medicine Associates, P.C. and Does 1-50
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 sh Diversity-Sexual Harassment
Juarez Zelaya v. City of Los Angeles, et al.
as 23-4186
Plaintiff / Appellee:
NICOLE JUAREZ ZELAYA, Individually and as Successor in Interest to Decedent, Jacobo Juarez Cedillo
Defendant / Appellant:
CITY OF LOS ANGELES, DUSTIN RICHMOND and JOSEPH HUNT
Zelaya-Romero, et al. v. Garland
as 23-3915
Petitioner:
ARIXI MARBELY ZELAYA-ROMERO and RUTH IVETH CARILLO-ZELAYA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00793
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
United States v. Zelaya-Pacheco
as 23-3213
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
NINCY SARAHI ZELAYA-PACHECO
Zelaya-Medrano v. Walmart Stores East, LP
as 2:2023cv00894
Plaintiff:
Lurvin Zelaya-Medrano
Defendant:
Walmart Stores East, LP and Wal-Mart Stores East, LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Angela Palma-Zelaya v. Merrick Garland
as 23-3837
Petitioner:
ANGELA ELIZABETH PALMA-ZELAYA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. Attorney General
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
