Cases 1 - 10 of 3,328
Collins v. Starks
as 2:2024cv00443
Plaintiff:
Tevin Collins
Defendant:
Travis Starks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv06389
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Starks v. Revlon, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv12163
Defendant:
Revlon Consumer Products Corporation, Revlon, Strength of Nature, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Roxie Starks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Tatum v. People of the State of Illinois, The - Cook County et al
as 1:2024cv12151
Defendant:
Gavin Quinn, Enyinnaya O. Nwagwu, Robert Holland and others
Plaintiff:
William Tatum
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
v. House et al
as 4:2024cv00167
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley and April Stark House
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
STARKS v. FASHION NOVA LLC
as 2:2024cv10141
Plaintiff:
SHAIANNE STARKS
Defendant:
FASHION NOVA LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv10079
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
B9 MF Sweetwater Holdings LLC v. Starks et al
as 1:2024cv05348
Defendant:
Phyllis Starks and Michael Starks
Plaintiff:
B9 MF Sweetwater Holdings LLC doing business as Retreat at Sweetwater
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Starks v. Biden et al
as 1:2024cv00493
Defendant:
Indiana State of, Joe Biden and Kamala Harris
Plaintiff:
Calvin L Starks, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dean v. Tuter et al
as 0:2024cv62169
Plaintiff:
James Dean
Defendant:
Lorena Mastrarrigo, Dale Cohen, Christopher Wigand and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
