Cases 1 - 10 of 44
Terrence Jefferson v. Florida Department of Corrections
as 24-10829
Petitioner:
TERRENCE B. JEFFERSON
Respondent:
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Cofield et al v. Passport Motors Holding Inc., et al.
as 1:2023cv01795
Plaintiff:
Dr. Keenan Cofield, Laverne Thompson, Kayla Nedd and others
Defendant:
X Corp, as successor in interest to named Defendant Twitter, Inc., PASSPORT MOTORS HOLDINGS, INC., U.S. Attorneys Office and others
Trustee:
Patricia B Jefferson and Hon. Patricia B. Jerfferson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
JEFFERSON v. Florida Department of Corrections
as 1:2021cv24367
Plaintiff:
TERRENCE B JEFFERSON
Defendant:
Mark Inch and Florida Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
JEFFERSON v. INCH
as 4:2021cv00497
Petitioner:
TERRENCE B JEFFERSON
Respondent:
MARK INCH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
JEFFERSON v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2020cv07148
Defendant:
TOWNSHIP OF EDISON, NEW JERSEY PROPERTY-LIABILITY GUARANTY ASSOCIATION, KEITHA B JEFFERSON and others
Plaintiff:
JEFFERSON AL-MALIK and AL-MALIK JEFFERSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv01373
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Jones v. Jefferson et al
as 9:2017cv81046
Plaintiff:
Dytrell Jones
Defendant:
B. Jefferson, W. Lewis, T. Young and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jefferson v. Social Security Administration
as 4:2017cv00490
Plaintiff:
Neliaseya B Jefferson
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Louis Stridic v. Paul Archie, et al
as 16-41425
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LOUIS B. JEFFERSON STRIDIC
Defendant - Appellee:
PAUL ARCHIE, MARIE BLASINGAME, U. P. BLACKWELL, Warden and others
Tagle v. Anderson et al
as 2:2016cv00757
Respondent:
Michael Anderson, Artinger, Renee Baker and others
Petitioner:
Victor Tagle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
